What did fur traders and missionaries in New France both do?
The Missionaries supported the spread of religious knowledge to the Natives, and spread it, while the Fur Trade supported the exchange of goods, knowledge, and services to ensure prosperity and trust.
Why did France want to trade for fur with the natives?
Because the English colonies had a much larger population than New France, the French needed Indian allies to help them fight the English. The Indians continued to trade with the French because they wanted European goods.
What role did the fur trade and fur traders play in the success of the French colonies?
Although its annual value paled in comparison to that of the North Atlantic cod fisheries, the fur trade was nevertheless the economic engine of New France: it underwrote exploration, evangelization, and settlement initiatives while providing income for habitant households and generating private fortunes for officials.
Which of the following was most important for French fur traders?
Module 3 Test
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Which of the following was most important for French fur traders? | maintaining good relations with American Indians |
| Which country began setting up missions in the American Southwest in the late 1500s? | Spain |
| What did Spanish missions promote to American Indians? | European-style settlements |
What are two factors that ended the fur trade?
What three factors ended the fur trade? 1. Fur bearing animals were almost gone. 2….
- to see if river travel all the way to the Pacific Ocean was. possible.
- to learn about the land, plants, animals.
- to learn about the native Indian people.
What caused an increase in demand for the fur trade?
The Supply of Furs: The Harvesting of Beaver and Depletion. During the eighteenth century, the changing technology of felt production and the growing demand for felt hats were met by attempts to increase the supply of furs, especially the supply of beaver pelts.
What 2 countries were most involved in the fur trade?
Answer Expert Verified. The first Europeans that traded fur were the French and the British.
Why was the fur trade bad?
The fur trade resulted in many long term effects that negatively impacted Native people throughout North America, such as starvation due to severely depleted food resources, dependence on European and Anglo-American goods, and negative impacts from the introduction of alcohol-which was often exchanged for furs.
How did the fur trade affect the economy?
When hunting for food, Indigenous peoples would take only what they needed. Surpluses. were not necessary. Now, the fur trade economy meant that the more furs hunted, the more money there was to be made.
What happened to the fur trade?
The fur trade started to decline in the Eastern United States by the late 1700’s. The decline resulted chiefly from the clearing of large areas for settlement. In addition, the value of beaver fur dropped sharply in the 1830’s, when European hat manufacturers began to use silk instead of felt.
How did the fur trade increase conflict between the British and the French?
Competition between the French and English for trade increased as their needs kept rising while the fur provided by the natives dwindled as fur-bearing animals reduced in numbers. Moreover, as the fur trade nourished; traders from France established companies to collect the furs in Canada.
Why is the fur trade historically significant for Canada?
Significance. Historically, the fur trade played a singular role in the development of Canada. It provided the motive for the exploration of much of the country. The trade remained the economic foundation of Western Canada until about 1870.
Which country started the fur trade France or England?
The French started trading in the 16th century, the English established trading posts on Hudson Bay in present-day Canada during the 17th century, while the Dutch had traded by the same time in New Netherland.
Why did the British and the French go to war in the 1750s?
In the early 1750s, France’s expansion into the Ohio River valley repeatedly brought it into conflict with the claims of the British colonies, especially Virginia. Borrowing heavily to finance the war, he paid Prussia to fight in Europe and reimbursed the colonies for raising troops in North America.