Is where she went a sequel to If I stay?
Sequel. If I Stay is followed by the sequel Where She Went, released in April 2011. The novel picks back up years after Mia’s accident. This time, however, the novel is told from the perspective of Adam, Mia’s (now) ex-boyfriend.
Where is she going or where she is going?
Your first alternative – with the auxiliary verb “was” preceding the pronoun “she” – is correct if asking a direct question (and with the addition of the corresponding punctuation mark): “When she left the house this morning, where was she going?”
Can we use were with she?
We use “was” with I, he, she, it when speaking of the past: it is the singular past form of the verb “to be”. We use “were” with you and they and we: it is the plural past form. But sometimes we can use “were” with I (he, she, it): I wish I were a sailor.
Where did she go and what did she do class 7th?
Where did she go and what did she do? Ans. She took Sanyas (renunciation) and went to Shaivite and Sufi School. She gave up worldly pursuits and pleasures to know God.
How did Mr Nath look?
Solution: Mr Nath used to have a visitor on every Sunday. He was a spectacled tall, fair and stout man.
Who is Mr Nath *?
Mr. Nath is a patient, whose treatment is undergoing for scars on his face. Thanks for answering but it’s not given in book is he really a criminal or something…..
Who was Mr Nath?
Mr. Nath is a patient of the doctor mother of Maya and Nishad. He is a thin person who has suffered a lot during his life. He is a man with simple nature and always takes simple meals.
Is Mr Nath a criminal?
Nishad disagreed with Maya for calling Mr Nath a criminal. He felt bad for him for having no friends while Maya thought that the visitor who comes to his place on Sunday may be his partner who know all his secrets and may be the loot as well.
What did Nishad gave Mr Nath Why?
Answer: Nishad gave a bar of chocolate to Mr. Nath. He did so because of the lean appearance of Mr. Nath, which suggested that he was starving.
Who was Mr Gessler?
Gessler was a shoemaker who lived in London. He was very famous. The author John Galsworthy knew him because his father used to go to his shop. Gessler was the best shoemaker in the entire area of London.
Why did Gessler die?
Mr. Gessler died of starvation. He was a very dedicated worker and he wouldn’t let anyone touch the boot, except himself. As a result, he died of starvation.
How was Mr Gessler a failure in business?
Mr Gessler was successful as a bootmaker because his customers were immensely satisfied with the boot he made. This perfectly fit them and lasted long. Yes, he was a failure as a competitive businessman. He lost his customers because of the delay in delivery.
What was Mr Gessler complaint against?
What was Mr Gessler’s complaint against “big firms”? Answer: Mr Gessler complained that the big firms were making money through attracting customers by advertisements. They were not earning because of the quality of their work but because of the marketing.
Why did the wicked old couple kill the dog?
Why did the neighbours kill the dog? Ans. The neighbours killed the dog in anger. They have expected the dog to help them get a treasure, but the dog had rather taken them to a foul smelling dead kitten.
What was the effect on Mr Gessler?
What was Mr Gessler’s complaint against “big firms”? Ans: Mr Gessler’s complaint against “big firms” that they didn’t have self respect. They got their business by advertisement not by work. Every year, the sell of Mr Gessler is getting less because of them and soon he will left with no job.
Why did the Neighbours kill the dog?
Ques: Why did the neighbours kill the dog? Answer: The neighbors killed the dog in anger. They have expected the dog to help them get a treasure, but the dog had rather taken them to a foul-smelling dead kitten.
How did the dog help him next?
The spirit of the dog again came into the good old mans dream and told him how the wicked neighbours had burned their mill. Then the spirit advised him to take the ashes of his mill and sprinkle them on the withered trees. This way the dogs spirit helped him next.
How did the old couple become rich once again?
Answer: (i) The old farmer and his wife loved the dog as if it was their own baby. (ii) When the old couple became rich, they lived comfortably and were generous towards their poor neighbours. (iii) The greedy couple borrowed the mill and the mortar to make a pile of gold.
Why did the greedy couple coax and feed the dog?
Answer. Answer: When the wicked old couple heard about the good luck of their neighbors, they coaxed the dog into their garden and set before him bits of fish and other dainties, hoping he would find the treasure for them.
Why did the old couple love their pet so dearly?
Answer: (i) The old farmer and his wife loved the dog as if it was their own baby. (ii) When the old couple became rich, they lived comfortably and were generous towards their poor neighbours.
What was the old farmer’s reaction when their pet dog was killed?
The old farmer heard that their pet dog had been killed by the wicked neighbour. He became very sad as if he had lost his own son. He visited the place where his pet dog had been buried. He mourned for the dog for quite a long time.
What did Muko do to attract the farmer’s attention Why?
A pile of gold was lying buried in the ground and it had been smelt by Muko. He put his paws against his owner’s legs and motioned with his head to some spot behind. Thus, the farmer’s attention was attracted by him.
How did the spirit of dog help the farmer first?
The spirit of the dog came in the farmer’s dream and first asked him to chop the pine tree and make mortar and hand-mill out of it. With the mortar and mill it gave the farmer heaps of gold. The farmer did this in front of the daimio (the landlord) and was awarded with lavish gifts.
Why did the Daimio reward the farmer but punish his Neighbour for the same act?
The daimio rewarded the farmer because he was honest. When he sprinkled a pinch of ash over the withered cherry tree, it sprouted and gave cool shade to the king. But when his neighbour did the same act, the cherry tree didn’t blossom.