Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals a primary source documents that are useful in the study of history B reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source C secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history D unreliable sources?

Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals a primary source documents that are useful in the study of history B reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source C secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history D unreliable sources?

The correct answer is A. Primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.

Which of these answers best describes what a historian does?

Explanation: To come up with theories about the past, is the right answer. A person who studies and records details about the past is known as a historian. Therefore, the main task of a historian is to come up with theories about the past.

What best describes the work of a historian?

Historians collect and evaluate information from many primary sources to answer questions about historical events, a process known as the historical method. They may analyze written records, physical artifacts, and other types of evidence during the course of their investigations.

What do historians do quizlet?

Examine the causes of events from the past, look for the effects of the events, and they explain why things are the way they are.

What is a correct assumption historians make when they evaluate a source of information?

What is an assumption historians make when they evaluate a source of information? They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. What would be the most helpful question a historian could ask to learn more about the cause of the Black Death?

How do historians label time?

Most of the world measures time by saying that something happened either before or after the birth of Christ. To do this, they use the words BC (Before Christ) . AD (Anno Domini-which means in the year of the Lord). Decades (10 years) are used to explain if something happened tens of years ago.

Which can help historians decide if a source is reliable?

Answer Expert Verified. 1 “Determining the author’s point of view on the subject” can help historians to decide whether the source is reliable or not.

How do you know if the source is reliable?

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.

1. 1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source.
2. 2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution.
3. 3) Currency.
4. 4) Coverage.

How do you tell if a journal is primary or secondary?

To determine if a source is primary or secondary, ask yourself:

1. Was the source created by someone directly involved in the events you’re studying (primary), or by another researcher (secondary)?
2. Does the source provide original information (primary), or does it summarize information from other sources (secondary)?