What primary source document could help a historian understand why the US Civil War started?

What primary source document could help a historian understand why the US Civil War started?

The primary source document that could help a historian understand why the US Civil War started is a Charleston Mercury editorial published in 1860 because it contains factual accounts of the events during that time.

Which source would help a historian best understand the effect of the civil war on soldiers families?

Answer Expert Verified. Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be the “diary of a soldier during the war,” since this would give a first-hand account of the conflict.

Which source would best help a historian?

Primary sources are valuable to historians because they give insight into the ways in which historical figures understood or internalized what they experienced, their place or significance in history, and give historians an understanding of historical figures’ opinions.

Which is the best example of a primary source document useful in the study of history?

journal excerpt

Which of the following is the best example of a primary source?

Examples of a primary source are: Original documents such as diaries, speeches, manuscripts, letters, interviews, records, eyewitness accounts, autobiographies. Empirical scholarly works such as research articles, clinical reports, case studies, dissertations. Creative works such as poetry, music, video, photography.

Why is primary source important in history?

The use of primary sources exposes students to important historical concepts. First, students become aware that all written history reflects an author’s interpretation of past events. Second, through primary sources the students directly touch the lives of people in the past.

How do you know if a source is valuable?

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.

  1. 1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source.
  2. 2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution.
  3. 3) Currency.
  4. 4) Coverage.

How do you evaluate sources of history?

Think about these questions when evaluating primary sources:

  1. Ask who is responsible for the information. Who are they?
  2. Ask who the original audience was. Get a sense for why the information was created in the first place.
  3. Ask whether other sources match.

What does a historian think about when analyzing a primary source?

Analyzing Primary Sources. Historians analyze historical sources in different ways. First, historians think about where, when and why a document was created. They consider whether a source was created close in location and time to an actual historical event.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top