What role does Daisy play in The Great Gatsby?
On a symbolic level, Daisy represents wealth. Her voice is “full of money” and she is the person that Gatsby and Tom each desire to attain (and/or keep) as a sign of their own achievement and wealth. She is, then, a symbolic property; a suggested sign of material prosperity.
Why did Gatsby and Daisy’s relationship fail?
Daisy can’t be blamed for her refusal to run away with Gatsby: she has a daughter to care and a lifestyle she is very attached to. She leaves him again, but even this time Gatsby doesn’t believe this is for real. Daisy is too connected to his American dream to believe that it is the end, an ultimate failure.
What is Myrtle Wilson’s personality?
Myrtle Wilson Personality Statistics
Trait | Average rating | Rating standard deviation |
---|---|---|
flamboyant (not modest) | 85.1 | 14.8 |
playful (not shy) | 85.0 | 13.7 |
indulgent (not sober) | 84.4 | 16.2 |
impulsive (not cautious) | 84.3 | 15.0 |
How does Nick’s House reflect his personality?
How does each home reflect the personality of its owner? Nick’s house is more reserved and not at all flashy, similar to his quiet personality. Gatsby’s house is very dripping with wealth to the point of borderline tackiness, to show off his money. When Nick leaves the Buchanan’s house, he is not comfortable.
What does Jordan say about Gatsby What does this reveal about her perception of him?
After the lunch in New York, Nick sees Jordan Baker, who finally tells him the details of her mysterious conversation with Gatsby at the party. She relates that Gatsby told her that he is in love with Daisy Buchanan. Because he is terrified that Daisy will refuse to see him, Gatsby wants Nick to invite Daisy to tea.
What is the significance of Tom’s reference to the book he is reading?
What is the significance of Tom’s reference to the book he is reading? The book presents a white supremacist view over blacks. Why does Daisy hope her child will be a beautiful fool? She was trying to imply that the life of a woman is a happier one in ignorance.