Can I use first person in a research paper?
Can I Use First-Person Pronouns in a Research Paper? Yes! For example, the first person is more likely used in the abstract, introduction, discussion, and conclusion sections of an academic paper while the third person and passive constructions are found in the methods and results sections.
Are PhD thesis peer reviewed?
This is because even though dissertations are not peer-reviewed (published in peer-reviewed journals), they are often considered scholarly because they were written for an academic audience. Dissertations and theses have value as research material, and they are an important form of scholarly communication.
Can you cite a masters thesis?
Yes, you can cite another master’s thesis. You also should, if it is relevant to the work. But, generally speaking this should be fine, as Masters thesis are examples of completed and verified research (in that they have either undergone defense or are peer reviewed – as was my case).
What does it mean when a source is peer-reviewed?
A peer-reviewed publication is also sometimes referred to as a scholarly publication. The peer-review process subjects an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field (peers) and is considered necessary to ensure academic scientific quality.
What counts as a peer-reviewed source?
Peer-reviewed (refereed or scholarly) journals – Articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article’s quality. (The article is more likely to be scientifically valid, reach reasonable conclusions, etc.)
What is a credible scholarly source?
The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources.
Who decides if an academic article is published?
Peer Review (scholarly) – comprehensive process where other experts in a field evaluating the quality of a manuscript and determine if the manuscript is suitable for publication in a journal.