What is blind peer reviewing?

What is blind peer reviewing?

In single-blind peer review, the authors do not know who the reviewers are. The reviewers know who the authors are. In double-blind peer review, neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s names. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model. However, both models exist to eliminate bias in peer review.

What is mean by peer reviewed?

A peer-reviewed publication is also sometimes referred to as a scholarly publication. The peer-review process subjects an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field (peers) and is considered necessary to ensure academic scientific quality.

Where can I find free peer-reviewed articles?

The Top 21 Free Online Journal and Research Databases

• CORE. CORE is a multidisciplinary aggregator of open access research.
• ScienceOpen.
• Directory of Open Access Journals.
• Education Resources Information Center.
• arXiv e-Print Archive.
• Social Science Research Network.
• Public Library of Science.
• OpenDOAR.

Where can I find peer-reviewed scholarly journals?

The easiest way to find a peer-reviewed article is by using one of the Library’s numerous databases. All of the Library’s databases are listed in the Online Journals and Databases index. The databases are divided by name and discipline.

Is peer-reviewed the same as scholarly?

In short, “scholarly” means the article was written by an expert for an audience of other experts, researchers or students. “Peer-reviewed” takes it one step further and means the article was reviewed and critiqued by the author’s peers who are experts in the same subject area..

How do you know if something is relevant?

Define What Makes a Source “Relevant”

1. The source must be credible. It is verifiable.
2. The source must also be accurate. More than just making sure the information is not false, it must be completely true.
3. The third criterion is that the source is relevant. The information addresses the thesis statement and/or answers the research question.

What should you consider before determining if a source is worth your attention?

When considering the relevancy of a source, there are several things to ask yourself: Is the scope of the source is appropriate for your research? Does the source provide a general overview of your topic or is it focused specifically on a single aspect of your topic? Who is the intended audience for the source?

How do you know if a source is outdated?

Look within the text for dates, or scan the citation/references list (if available). If all of the sources that the article mentions or cites are several years old, then the article itself was probably published a few years ago, too.

How can you tell if information is reliable?

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.

1. 1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source.
2. 2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution.
3. 3) Currency.
4. 4) Coverage.

What are the 5 key criteria used to assess a website?

5 Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages: Home

• Introduction.
• Accuracy.
• Authority.
• Objectivity.
• Currency.
• Coverage.
• Quiz.

What are the five criteria?

The definition contains five evaluation criteria that should be used in assessing development interventions: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability.

What are the five major steps in Web publishing?

These are the steps required for Web publishing.

• Planning a Web site. Identify the purpose of the Web site.
• Analyzing and designing a Web site.
• Creating a Web site.
• Deploying a Web site.
• Maintaining a Web site.

What are the four main criteria?

Answer: The four main criteria to use when evaluating resources are: Authority, Objectivity, Currency, and Coverage.

What are the four steps for evaluating websites?

Keep these things in mind when deciding if a web page is reliable and appropriate for your research:

• authority/credibility.
• accuracy/verifiability.
• bias/objectivity.
• currency/timeliness.
• scope/depth.
• intended audience/purpose.