Why do we need to review the related literatures in making our study?
Reviewing the literature lets you see what came before, and what did and didn’t work for other researchers. To demonstrate your understanding, and your ability to critically evaluate research in the field. To provide evidence that may be used to support your own findings.
What is the importance of review of related literature?
The purpose of a literature review is to: Identify need for additional research (justifying your research) Identify the relationship of works in context of its contribution to the topic and to other works. Place your own research within the context of existing literature making a case for why further study is needed.
What are the disadvantages of literature review?
They may spend unnecessary time and resources on searching for the reviews. It is time consuming for the teachers to correct and provide feedback. Literature reviews require good supervision from teachers particularly for students who are inexperienced in this type of assessment.
How do you assess a literature review?
Tips to Evaluate Sources
- Authority: Who is the author? what is his/her credentials–what university he/she is affliliated?
- Usefulness: How this source related to your topic? How current or relevant it is to your topic?
- Reliability: Does the information comes from a reliable, trusted source such as an academic journal?
What are the main criteria for selecting literature to review?
Selecting the Literature
- Have you clearly indicated the scope and purpose of the review?
- Have you included a balanced coverage of what is available?
- Have you included the most recent and relevant studies?
- Have you included enough material to show the development and limitations in this area?
What is the difference between a primary and secondary source quizlet?
A primary source is original material from the time period under investigation. A secondary source is something that relates to or demonstrates the primary source.
What is secondary source in history?
In contrast, a secondary source of information is one that was created later by someone who did not experience first-hand or participate in the events or conditions you’re researching. For the purposes of a historical research project, secondary sources are generally scholarly books and articles.
How do we use secondary sources?
What can you do with secondary sources?
- Support your thesis. One of the most basic things you can do with secondary sources is to find somebody who agrees with the argument you’re making.
- Present opposing viewpoints. A thesis is only interesting if it’s open to interpretation.
- Provide background information.
What is the purpose of a secondary sources?
Secondary sources provide good overviews of a subject, so are particularly useful if you need to find about an area that’s new to you. They are also helpful because you can find keywords to describe a subject area, as well as key authors and key references that you can use to do further reading and research.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of accessing secondary sources?
- Advantages: Secondary sources provide a variety of expert perspectives and insights.
- Disadvantages: Because secondary sources are not necessarily focused on your specific topic, you may have to dig to find applicable information.
- Advantages: They offer a quick, easy introduction to your topic.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of primary and secondary data?
Some common advantages of primary data are its authenticity, specific nature, and up to date information while secondary data is very cheap and not time-consuming. Primary data is very reliable because it is usually objective and collected directly from the original source.
What is one drawback of using secondary sources?
A major disadvantage of using secondary data is that it may not answer the researcher’s specific research questions or contain specific information that the researcher would like to have.