Who made the Trolley Problem?
Philippa Foot
How would a Deontologist respond to the trolley problem?
Deontology The ends never justify the means. In the case of the trolley problem, this would mean that the conductor must choose one metric for fairness that they never break. This could mean they choose to always save the most lives, the youngest lives, the oldest lives, etc..
Is it OK to sacrifice a few to save many?
If you are a Utilitarian, then sacrificing the few for the need of the many is a reasonable thing to do. If you are a Utilitarian, then sacrificing the few for the need of the many is a reasonable thing to do.
What is Thomson’s solution to the trolley problem?
In “The Trolley Problem,” Thomson offered a solution—call this her First Solu- tion—according to which the bystander may flip the switch in Bystander be- cause were he to do so (1) he makes what was threatening five come to threaten only one and (2) he does so not by any means that constitute an infringement of any …
Where did the trolley problem originate?
Its story begins in 1967 at Oxford University, when the “grand dame of philosophy” Philippa Foot devised the example of the runaway streetcar—“tram” in England, “trolley” in the U.S.—while discussing the permissibility of abortion.
Would you push the fat man off the bridge?
However, a fat man, a stranger, is standing next to you: if you push him off the bridge, he will topple onto the line and, although he will die, his chunky body will stop the train, saving five lives.
How would you solve the Trolley Problem?
Trolley problem
- Do nothing and allow the trolley to kill the five people on the main track.
- Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.
What is dilemma example?
The definition of a dilemma is a situation where there is no clear easy choice or answer. An example of a dilemma is when you only have two extra tickets to an event and three friends that want to go.
What are the four moral standards?
The GCC is structured around four moral values: fairness, respect, care and honesty.
What makes action morally wrong?
According to Moral Foundations Theory, an action may be considered to be wrong because: it is harmful, it is unfair or unjust, it shows disloyalty to a group, it is disrespectful to an authority, or it is impure or gross.
Is lying morally wrong?
The philosopher Immanuel Kant said that lying was always morally wrong. Lies are morally wrong, then, for two reasons. First, lying corrupts the most important quality of my being human: my ability to make free, rational choices. Each lie I tell contradicts the part of me that gives me moral worth.
How do you know if something is morally wrong?
To know if something complex is moral, we need to know not only the action but the cause, the mind-set of the person taking the action, and the intended effect. Moral knowledge can be derived from measuring the impressions a person has about an action, and investigating the thinking of the person who made the action.
How do you know if you are right or wrong?
It is the idea that we know the ethical value of right and wrong by listening to our conscience. That still, small voice inside is what tells us whether something is right or wrong.
What is amoral action?
‘Amoral’ Meaning These are illustrative examples, however; amoral can be used to describe any person, or his or her actions, who is aware of what is right and wrong but does wrong anyway and responds indifferently about it.