Who said the tyranny of the majority?

Who said the tyranny of the majority?

In 1831, an ambitious and unusually perceptive twenty-five-year-old French aristocrat, Alexis de Tocqueville, visited the United State

What are the argument against democracy?

Following are three arguements against democracy are: Change in leaders from time to time (elections) can bring about instability in the government There is a consumption of excessive time for taking decisions because of consultation to many people, which leads to delays

What are the five arguments against democracy?

Arguments against democracy are listed below

  • Changes in leaders contribute to instability
  • Just political conflict, no place for morality
  • Consulting more individuals contributes to delays
  • Ordinary people are unaware of what’s good for them
  • Contributes to corruption

What are the three arguments against democracy?

Write any three arguments against democracy?

  • Leaders keep changing in a democracy This leads to political instability
  • Democracy is all about political competition and power play There is no scope for morality
  • So many people have to be consulted in a democracyIt leads to political instability

What are the arguments for democracy?

(i) A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government (ii) Democracy improves the quality of decision-making (iii) Democracy provides methods to deal with differences and conflicts (iv) Democracy enhances the dignity of citizen

What is the strongest argument for democracy?

Democracy is a form of government where complete power rests in the hands of the people That is why it is also called government OF the people,FOR the people and BY the people ↔IT ENHANCES THE DIGNITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL ↔IT PROMOTES EQUALITY AMONG CITIZEN

What are the merit and demerits of democracy?

5 merits and demerits of democracy

  • a democratic government is better form of government because it is more accountable form of government
  • democracy improves the quality of decision making
  • democracy enhances the dignity of citizens
  • poor and least educated has the same status as the rich and educated

What are merits and demerits of electoral competition?

(i) An electoral competition creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality (ii) Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against one another (iii) Parties and candidates often use dirty tricks to win elections

What is political competition what are its merits and demerits?

1) It creates competition among parties to serve the people better 2)People will have lot of options among various leaders 4) Political Competition mostly benefits the people as parties will do their best to lure the people 5) Poltical Competition leads to the development of the natio

What are the two demerits of electoral competition?

Demerits of electoral competition are:

  • It creates disunity and factionalism in every locality
  • Different political Parties and leaders often level allegations against one another
  • It is often said that the pressure to win electoral fights does not allow sensible long-term policies to be formulated

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top