Who might have had a negative view of Roman expansion?

Who might have had a negative view of Roman expansion?

Who might have had a negative view of Roman expansion during this period, and why? 2. Plebeians would have objected to this expan- sion because they had to serve in the army. Defeated people would have objected because they had to serve in the army, pay Roman taxes, and couldn’t always become Roman citizens.

What was the reason for Roman expansion?

Rome was able to gain its empire in large part by extending some form of citizenship to many of the people it conquered. Military expansion drove economic development, bringing enslaved people and loot back to Rome, which in turn transformed the city of Rome and Roman culture.

Why was the Roman Republic in trouble during the third period of expansion?

By the end of Rome’s third period of expansion, the republic collapsed. The final years of the republic were marked by still more wars. Many of Rome’s allies resented having to pay Roman taxes and fight in Roman armies without enjoying the rights of citizens. In 91 B.C.E., they rebelled.

What was a negative consequence of the expansion of the Roman territory?

Expansion weakened the economy of Rome. Not only did it stretch resources thin, but enslaved labor hurt regular farmers in the empire. Others suffered, too, as the gap between the rich and poor widened. In time, unrest led to civil wars.

Why did the early Roman Republic expand so quickly quizlet?

Why did the early Roman Republic expand so quickly? Rome used the Latin Right to integrate new territory into the republic. Rome required that new territories supply soldiers for the Roman army. The balance of power between men and women shifted somewhat in the second century B.C.E.

What did Rome achieve during the first period of expansion?

The First Period of Expansion The first period of expansion, or becoming larger, began in 509 B.C.E. At this time, the Romans drove the last Etruscan king out of power, and Rome became a republic. The Romans wanted to protect their borders and to gain more land. They also defeated their old rulers, the Etruscans.

Why were slaves important in Rome and what were their lives like quizlet?

Farm slaves worked and slept chained together. Slaves with special skills could earn money buy freedom and become rich and famous. How were the slaves treated in ancient Rome? The poor were usually jobless and survived by only handouts from the government.

How were the lives of the rich and the poor different in ancient Rome?

In ancient Rome, the lives of rich and poor people were very different. The poor lived in the dirtiest, noisiest, most crowded parts of the city. Their houses were poorly constructed. These four- and five-story apartment buildings usually lacked heat, water, and kitchens.

What is the difference between Freeman and slaves?

Answer: A freeman is a person who is fully entitled to rights, while slave are legal property that have no rights.

What can you infer about the Romans attitudes toward their gods?

They thought that creating an empire gave them favor of the gods. What can you infer about the Romans’ attitudes towards their gods? They thought that all gods were good and they believed in all gods. This could bring in more people from other empires.

What is the religion of Rome?

The city is commonly regarded as the “home of the Catholic Church”, owing to the ecclesiastical doctrine of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. Today, there are also other religions common in Rome, including Islam.

Who were the workers in poor Roman families?

The term plebeian referred to all free Roman citizens who were not members of the patrician, senatorial or equestrian classes. Plebeians were average working citizens of Rome – farmers, bakers, builders or craftsmen – who worked hard to support their families and pay their taxes.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top