For what reason does the book justify representative democracy quizlet?

For what reason does the book justify representative democracy quizlet?

Samuel P. Huntington. For what reason does the book justify representative democracy? Deciding wisely on issues is impractical and unlikely, but deciding on leaders is possible.

Why is political legitimacy important?

Political legitimacy is considered a basic condition for governing, without which a government will suffer legislative deadlock(s) and collapse. In political systems where this is not the case, unpopular régimes survive because they are considered legitimate by a small, influential élite.

What type of authority is based on written rules?

Rational-Legal Authority

What is another name for rational-legal authority?

Rational-legal authority (also known as rational authority, legal authority, rational domination, legal domination, or bureaucratic authority) is a form of leadership in which the authority of an organization or a ruling regime is largely tied to legal rationality, legal legitimacy and bureaucracy.

What is rational-legal authority in simple terms?

Plural: rational-legal authorities. Rational-legal authority is legitimate because laws, rules, norms, and procedures are respected and obeyed because they are laws, rules, norms, and procedures. Rational-legal authority is reifying and rarely challenged.

Why is authority important in society?

Authority can be used to protect our rights to life, liberty, and property. Authority can be used to provide order and security in people’s lives. Authority can be used to protect important rights and freedoms. For example: the First Amendment of the Constitution protects our freedom of expression and belief.

What is a rational bureaucracy?

Bureaucratic rationality is identified as domination through knowledge, or that which allows things to be known. As such, bureaucratic rationality is the underlabourer allowing bureaucratic structures to function.

What concept is rationalist law based on?

Legal Rationalism is the theory that judges resolve legal disputes through legal rules, applied to facts.

Was Kant a rationalist or empiricist?

Kant’s philosophy has been called a synthesis of rationalism and empiricism. From rationalism he takes the idea that we can have a priori knowledge of significant truths, but rejects the idea that we can have a priori metaphysical knowledge about the nature of things in themselves, God, or the soul.