Which of the following clauses of the constitution could the Supreme Court have used when deciding the case Marbury v Madison 1803?

Which of the following clauses of the constitution could the Supreme Court have used when deciding the case Marbury v Madison 1803?

Which of the following clauses of the Constitution could the Supreme Court have used when deciding the case Marbury v. Madison (1803) ? “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made.”

Which of the following best explains why Congress has used its power to help certain?

Which of the following best explains why Congress has used its power to help certain types of businesses obtain federal contracts, as shown in the table? Congress is ensuring that the bureaucracy is accountable to groups other than large corporations.

Which one of the following did the Judiciary Act of 1789 accomplish?

Principally authored by Senator Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system and created the position of attorney general.

How did Congress organize the judiciary system?

How did the first Congress organize the judicial branch? Congress organize the judicial branch under Article III of the Constitution. Then congress pass the judiciary act which states the U.S Supreme Court was to have a chief justice and five associate justices.

Who was involved in the Judiciary Act of 1801?

Although a version of the bill had been introduced before the elections of 1800, John Adams signed the act into law on February 13, 1801, less than three weeks before the end of his term and that of the Federalist majority in the Sixth Congress.

What is included in the judicial review?

Judicial review, power of the courts of a country to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution. Actions judged inconsistent are declared unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void.