In what way was Martin Luther crude?
Answer: Martin Luther was a “crude man” because he was strongly against the corruption of the Catholic Church in the 16th century during Reformation. He was a “crude man” as he experienced no difficulty with looking at waging war against the individuals who contradicted his religious teachings.
What were Martin Lutherʼs religious views?
His central teachings, that the Bible is the central source of religious authority and that salvation is reached through faith and not deeds, shaped the core of Protestantism. Although Luther was critical of the Catholic Church, he distanced himself from the radical successors who took up his mantle.
Which of Martin Luthers disagreements with the Catholic Church do you think were most influenced by the Renaissance idea of humanism Why?
The disagreement with the Catholic Church that was most influence by the Renaissance idea of humanism was that it was wrong for the Church to sell indulgences, since this implied that humans could not have a strong, individual relationship with God.
Who was Martin Luther and what is his significance?
Martin Luther, a 16th-century monk and theologian, was one of the most significant figures in Christian history. His beliefs helped birth the Reformation—which would give rise to Protestantism as the third major force within Christendom, alongside Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.
Why did Martin Luther want to reform the church?
Luther’s belief in justification by faith led him to question the Catholic Church’s practices of self-indulgence. He objected not only to the church’s greed but to the very idea of indulgences. Over the next few years, however, his Ninety-Five Theses sparked a religious movement to reform the Catholic Church.
How did Martin Luther respond to the pope’s threat of excommunication?
Luther refused to recant and responded instead by composing polemical tracts lashing out at the papacy and by publicly burning a copy of the bull on 10 December 1520. As a result, Luther was excommunicated in 1521.
How did Martin Luther King disobey the law?
Using Civil Disobedience to Bring About Change Like Gandhi, King used civil disobedience as a means of effectuating government change. It took the form of large-scale, non-violent refusals to obey government commands. There were sit-ins and marches, all carried out against the wishes of local authorities.
Was Martin Luther King disobedient?
Martin Luther King, Jr., was arrested and jailed during these protests, writing his famous “Letter From Birmingham City Jail,” which advocates civil disobedience against unjust laws. Like Gandhi, King used civil disobedience as a means of effectuating government change.
Is disobedience good or bad?
Civil Disobedience is effective because it creates a lose-lose situation for whatever Power the Disobedience is directed towards. Civil disobedience provides a check against totalitarianism by showing that citizens won’t follow unjust laws and that there are limits to the use of discipline.
What does Martin Luther King Jr say about just and unjust laws when defending his civil disobedience?
But in defending his action, King invoked St. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law,” King responded. “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” And he concluded the point, by invoking St.
Why civil disobedience is wrong?
An act of civil disobedience places the individual at a higher risk of repercussion. Most acts which are classified under this subject violate laws at some level. Individuals could find themselves arrested because of their actions, shamed through print and social media, or confronted with force by law enforcement.
What is the pros and cons of disobedience?
The Pros of Civil Disobedience
- It is a way to protest without breaking the law. In many nations, civil disobedience can be performed without breaking additional laws.
- It draws attention to the issue.
- It can create real change.
- It can result in jail time.
- It doesn’t always create change.
- It takes time.
Does civil disobedience really work?
Non-violent civil disobedience is effective because it emphasizes a group’s proposed injustice within an institution, while directly appealing to the different ethical systems of individual citizens.