Which of the following presents a problem in juvenile aftercare?

Which of the following presents a problem in juvenile aftercare?

Which of the following presents a problem in juvenile aftercare? Youthful offenders are sent back to the same communities. Juveniles could not be held in institutions that did not provide for their rehabilitation.

Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court decision in Gideon v Wainwright 1963?

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves.

Which of the following best characterized the prosecution of youth in America during the nineteenth century?

The following best characterized the prosecution of youth in America during the nineteenth century: a tendency to punish children like adults. This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Which of the following rules says that evidence not obtained using proper procedures may be disallowed from trial?

Answer Expert Verified. It is called an exclusionary rule. It means that evidence that was handled improperly would not be admissible in court. This is because the evidence may have tampered to the point that it might not be acceptable to use during a trial.

Is character evidence admissible in court?

The general rule: CHARACTER EVIDENCE IS NOT ADMISSIBLE. More particularly, character evidence is generally not admissible when offered for the purposes of proving conduct in conformity with the character trait offered.

What character evidence is admissible?

When character evidence is admissible, Rule 405 says that “it may be proved by testimony about the person’s reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion.” It may not proved through evidence of specific events that illustrate the character trait in action.

What can character evidence be used for?

Character evidence is a term used in the law of evidence to describe any testimony or document submitted for the purpose of proving that a person acted in a particular way on a particular occasion based on the character or disposition of that person.

What is character evidence law?

Character means the collective qualities or characteristics especially mental and moral that distinguishes a person or thing. Character is the estimation of a person by his community. The general rule is that character evidence is inadmissible.

Why is evidence of reputation admissible?

The evidence may be used to impute that the accused is a good person in general or in a particular respect. Good character evidence can be opinion evidence from a witness about the character of the accused or evidence about the accused’s reputation in the community.

What is the value of character evidence?

Good Character Evidence The defence may adduce certain good character of the accused. An accused may call witnesses who will testify to his good character as relevant to show the accused is credible or that the accused is unlikely to have committed the offence.

Is opinion an evidence?

Opinion evidence refers to evidence of what the witness thinks, believes, or infers in regard to facts, as distinguished from personal knowledge of the facts themselves.

What are the 4 main dangers of hearsay?

B. A Closer Look at the Doctrine

• Hearsay doctrine rests of 4 risks of misperception, faulty memory, ambiguity, and insincerity and these risks appear not ONLY w/ verbal expression but ALSO with nonverbal conduct where the actor has assertive intent. Ex.
• Evidence of such behavior is also hearsay.

How do you identify hearsay evidence?

Seven Steps to (Hearsay) Heaven

1. Step 1 – Is there an assertion by a human?
2. Step 2 – is the assertion being offered for its truth?
3. Step 3 – is the assertion being offered for a reason other than for its truth?
4. Step 4 – if offered for its truth, is there a hearsay rule that permits admission?

What is inadmissible hearsay?

Broadly defined, “hearsay” is testimony or documents quoting people who are not present in court. When the person being quoted is not present, establishing credibility becomes impossible, as does cross-examination. As such, hearsay evidence is inadmissible.

What evidence is inadmissible in court?

Evidence that can not be presented to the jury or decision maker for any of a variety of reasons: it was improperly obtained, it is prejudicial (the prejudicial value outweighs the probative value), it is hearsay, it is not relevant to the case, etc.

What are the reasons for exclusion of hearsay evidence?

The reasons for exclusion of hearsay Evidence are as follows :

• Hearsay Evidence cannot be tested by Cross-Examination.
• It supposes some better evidence and encourages substitution of weaker for stronger evidence.
• Hearsay Evidence is intrinsically weak.

What is hearsay legal?

Definition. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts.

Are text messages hearsay in court?

Text messages and other ESI are hearsay by nature. The hearsay rule blocks admission of out of court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter at issue. But court rules, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, are full of exceptions and definitions of “non hearsay”.

What happens if a witness statement is not signed?

When a witness never signed the witness statement ,( although it was signed by another person, a co-worker, not the witness) and it is then used by the tribunal judge as evidence into the tribunal , does this then follow that witness statements are not evidence as the statements state ‘I believe that the facts stated …

What are two exceptions to witnesses giving evidence in court?

There are two exceptions: A person is not competent to give evidence in criminal proceedings if it appears to the Court that they are unable to understand questions put to them as a witness and give answers to them which can be understood [Section 53(3) of the YJCEA 1999].