Do you agree that the judiciary is responsible for punishing wrong doers and safeguarding the rights of the innocent justify your answer?

Do you agree that the judiciary is responsible for punishing wrong doers and safeguarding the rights of the innocent justify your answer?

The judiciary (also known as the judicial system or the court system) is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. yes i totally agree with the statement that judiciary is responsible for punishing wrong doers and safeguarding the rights of the innocent.

What is a role of judiciary?

Their functions are making of laws and execution of laws respectively. It is the backbone of the government because whenever there is a dispute between the Center and State, between State and the citizens and among the states, Judiciary is the only organ which controls the dispute and pass judgment.

Why judiciary is necessary for safeguarding the citizens right?

It safeguards rights of the individual, settles disputes in accordance with the law and ensures that democracy does not give way to individual or group dictatorship. In order to be able to do all this, it is necessary that the judiciary is independent of any political pressures.

What does the judicial branch have the power to do?

The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution. The Constitution is the highest law of our Nation. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, is part of the judicial branch.

How can the judiciary protect the fundamental right of citizen?

Judiciary protects our fundamental rights by issuing writs under article 226 or article 32, an individual can approach to designated court on violation of their fundamental rights, designated court shall issue the order to investigate in the particular case and if the authorities related to same case found guilty then …

How does the judicial process protect the Constitution?

The Right to Constitutional Remedy helps the individuals to protect their rights by seeking protection from the courts. Supreme Court can issue a writ under Article 32 of the Constitution whereas the High Court can issue a writ under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.

What role the judiciary has played in protecting and interpreting these rights?

Answer: The principal role of the judiciary is to protect rule of law and ensure supremacy of law. It safeguards rights of the individual, settles disputes in accordance with the law and ensures that democracy does not give way to individual or group dictatorship.

Why do we need the judiciary?

In a federal system, the judiciary has to perform an additionally important role as the guardian of the constitution and the arbiter of disputes between the centre and states. It acts as an independent and impartial umpire between the central government and state governments as well as among the states.

Who ensures quick and inexpensive function of judiciary?

Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law.

What would happen if there was no judiciary?

If there had been no judiciary, then the rights of the individuals might not have been conserved. People would have faced partiality, humiliation, discrimination, violence in every field.

What happens if the judiciary is not fair in a society?

If a judge is not fair and impartial, then one or both parties are denied their fundamental constitutional right to due process of law. When a judge enters the courtroom, his or her personal, political and religious beliefs must give way to the Rule of Law.

What would happen if there was no executive branch?

One of the jobs of the Executive branch is for the President to run the military and well being of our country. If there were no Executive branch, there’d be no President. Ultimately leaving our country unprotected.

What would happen if the judiciary was controlled by the executive?

Answer. It would be a formula for tyranny. The reason being that under a traditional separation of powers arrangement, the independent judiciary serves as a check on a rogue or overzealous executive. Only with the approval of the judiciary may someone be jailed long-term for (alleged) crimes.

How can you say that judiciary in India is the most powerful?

Hint: The Judiciary of India is the country’s highest body for dispensing justice. The Indian Constitution specifies that the highest judicial body is the Supreme Court of India and that it will do justice without any prejudice based on gender, sex, caste, and religion.

Do you think that judicial activism can lead to conflict between the judiciary and executive Why?

Answer. Answer: Judicial activism could lead to a conflict between judiciary and executive because of the interference of judiciary into the domain of executive. And the above being dealt by the judiciary makes the balance between the organs of government delicate.

What is the importance of independent judiciary?

The duty of judges is considered to be very pious, therefore the constitution has provided for independence of judiciary so that they can remain impartial to serve the constitutional goals, act fairly, reasonably, free of any fear or favor.

How is an independent judiciary important for a democracy?

Independent- provides checks and balances in a political democracy: Accountability to the people:Judicial independence is very important to uphold the democratic principle of accountability. It helps to keep the executive and legislature accountable to the people through judicial review and judicial activism.

What is an example of independent judiciary?

Throughout American history, the independence of the judiciary has protected individual liberties and prevented a tyranny of the majority. Examples include extending voting rights, ending segregation, protecting the average citizen from unwarranted government intrusion.

Can a judge ignore evidence?

Neither of the studies reports that jurors stubbornly refuse to ignore evidence. Trial attorneys must be vigilant to ensure that opposing attorneys do not ‘slip in’ inadmissible evidence. Few verdicts are reversed for error on appeal if instructions to disregard prejudicial evidence are given to the jury by the court.

What happens if a judge is biased?

In a situation where a judge is biased or prejudice, the result could be a decision that is not fair or impartial to one party in the case. Often, a judge will identify their own inability to be fair, neutral, and impartial and will recuse themselves from the case.

What are some ethical issues for judges?

Panelists emphasized three challenges to judicial ethical integrity above all others: competence, independence, and corruption. because they involve a prominent political figure, dissidents, or social organizations such as Falungong.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top