Why did Juror 8 change his vote?
It is through his persuasive abilities that one by one, the other jurors change their initial vote from guilty to not guilty. In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether.
Why does the evidence of the knife not convince Juror 8?
What happens to make the “knife theory” invalid? Juror 8 revealed that he had the same “one of a kind knife” that the defendant bought the night of the murder (which also ended up being the murder weapon or like the murder weapon).
What is Juror 8 reasoning for voting differently than his peers?
What is Juror #8’s reasoning for voting differently than his peers? The Juror #8 did not believe there was enough evidence to convict the boy. Also, He questions the bias of some jurors against the boy’s ethnicity and low social stature.
What proposal does Juror Eight Make at end of the act?
secret ballot vote
Why is Juror 3 angry?
In 12 Angry Men, Juror 3 is the most challenging juror because of his unwillingness to work well with the other jurors. Juror 3 tries to bully the other jurors into voting guilty. Juror 3 does not work well with others. He is a bully, and he often tries to belittle other people.
Why is Juror 8 a hero?
By the end of the movie, Juror #8 has proven himself to be a true hero for standing by his principles and having the courage and skill to put them to work. He eventually gets the jury to find the defendant Not Guilty, and in the process, he avoids sending an innocent 18 year-old kid to jail.
Is Juror 8 a true story?
Juror 8 is loosely based on the first trial by jury in South Korean history. Which leads the judge and jury — the real-life case actually had nine jurors — to reexamine the evidence before they all make a decision they’ll surely regret.
Why does Juror 8 call a secret ballot?
The vote by secret ballot that Eight proposes symbolizes an ideal principle of justice that is unbiased. The initial vote by hand, and the following discussion among the jurors, shows that many are swayed by the opinions of others, by the pressures of conformity, and by other concerns.
What does Juror 8 do for a living?
Juror 8’s name is Davis and his occupation is an architect. It is obvious that he was very intelligent and has many years of experience in his job. You can tell that he is a good architect when he specificly demonstrates things like how far the old man went from his room to the door and he even drew out blue prints.
When did Juror 10 change his vote?
1997
Why is Juror 11 so impressed with the jury system?
Juror 11 has a respect for the judicial system that is informed by his experience in his old country. He immigrated to America because he believes very deeply in the integrity of the system, even beyond the jurors born in the United States.
Who was last juror to vote not guilty?
12 Angry Men
| A | B |
|---|---|
| Old man juror | He’s the oldest person on the jury. He’s the second juror to vote not guilty. His name is McCardle (end of movie). |
| Angry juror | He’s the last juror to vote not guilty. He’s angry because he lost his son. |
Who was the first juror to vote?
12 Angry Men
| A | B |
|---|---|
| Juror 7 | He wants to vote quickly because he has theatre tickets for that night. |
| Juror 8 | He is the first juror to vote “not quilty” |
| Juror 5 | Because of his background, he is accused of changing his vote at the beginning of Act II. |
| Juror 9 | He is the first to change his vote to “not quilty” |
Why did Juror 9 change his vote not guilty?
Why had Nine changed his vote? Who is Nine? Nine changed his vote because Juror number 8 had courage to stand against everyone else, and he 8 gambled for support and made 9 want to hear more. Juror 9 is the old man.
Why did Juror 5 change his vote to not guilty?
Juror 9 bases his argument as to why the man lied by saying he is the same man and can relate. Why does Juror 5 change his vote? the old man could not have ‘run’ and even if he walked over he couldn’t have made his way over to the door as fast as he claimed. Juror 8 makes a new discovery as to why the boy is innocent.
What was Juror 3 doing that made Juror 8 angry?
At one point, the angry Juror #3 picks up the knife on the table and pretends to stab Juror #8 with it. The other jurors get ready to jump at him, but he’s only pretending for the sake of showing how the kid could have stabbed his father.
What is the conflict between Juror 8 and 3?
And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty. ” The main conflict between the two is that juror Number 8 did his ho9mework and juror Number 3 is basing his verdict on the fact that he doesn’t give any slck to those from the lower class because he simply doesn’t like them.
What does Juror Three do to Juror Eight that scares the other jurors and causes Juror 2 to cry look out?
Juror three volunteers to be the boy stabbing and juror eight volunteers to be the father that is being stabbed. At this point, juror three pretends to stab but brings the knife so close to juror three’s chest that the men actually think that he was close to stabbing him — which is why they yell out, “Look out.”
What does Juror Eight mean when he calls another juror a sadist?
Why does Juror 8 call Juror 3 a sadist? Because he shows no empathy towards the child and only wants to see him suffer.
What comments does Juror Eight make that seem to settle the argument about doubt?
What comments does juror eight make that seem to settle the argument about “doubt”? He repeats the evidence about the case, and it suggests that there is doubt; at least two agree, so they take another vote. To juror four, what is the most convincing evidence that the boy is guilty?
What piece of evidence does eight disprove?
How does Juror 8 disprove the old mans testimony of hearing and seeing the boy run down the stairs? Since the man was older, it would’ve been impossible for him to reach the door in just 15 seconds. What was the dramatic climax at the end of act 1?
What are the rebuttals Juror 8 gives to each piece of evidence?
Juror #8 picks apart each piece of evidence to persuade the others. Here are some of the observations: The old man could have invented his story because he craved attention. Some members of the jury decide that during a stressful situation, anyone could forget the names of the movie they had seen.
What is Four’s most convincing evidence that the boy is guilty?
To Four, what is the most convincing evidence that the boy is guilty? The evidence from the old lady who has seen the crime through her window. What is brought up to refute the woman’s claim that she saw the boy kill his father?
What was Juror #3 doing that made Juror #8 angry causing him to exclaim This isn’t a game?
What was Juror#3 doing that made Juror#8 angry, causing him to exclaim, “this isn’t a game!”? He was playing tic-tac-toe.
Why do jurors 3 and 4 believe the boy to be guilty?
Juror 3 voted guilty because he wanted to get it over with. He also didn’t have enough courage to stand alone, nor was able to give facts to back up his reasoning for saying the boy was guilty.
Did three finally believe the boy was not guilty?
Did Three finally believe the boy was not guilty, or did he vote just to get it over with? Support your answer. He voted because he believed he was not guilty. Four told him,”let him live,” and Eight said,”He is not your boy.
What does three reveal about himself by changing his vote?
What does 3 reveal about himself by changing his vote? He shows that he’s not as strong as 8 is–to stand up against so many and not give in. His character is weaker an he cannot sustain himself and his beliefs against pressure of others.
How did Juror 3 contradict himself?
Juror 3 said that whenever someone says this, they mean it. When Jurors 3 and 9 started arguing whether it was 15 or 20 seconds to get to his front door, Juror 3 contradicted himself. He said that half the time he was confused. Just before, he kept on saying how the old man was sure of himself.
What juror changed his vote next?
It is Juror Nine, the elderly man on the jury, who changes his vote from guilty to not guilty at the end of Act One, and he is the first juror to do so. Juror Nine changes his vote to support Juror Eight, who wants to discuss the evidence before reaching a verdict. Juror Nine says he wants to hear more, also.
Why do the jurors get up and turn their backs to the table?
Why do the other jurors turn their backs on 10’s statements about his true feelings. He is a ranting bigot and none of the others can put up with him any longer. By leaving the table, they are disassociating themselves from him.