Did John Lennon have a good voice?
John did have a terrific voice. It’s always amazing to me that Lennon hated the sound of it, and never liked what he heard in playback in the studio.
Was John Lennon a better singer than Paul?
As far as the vocals, Paul obviously had better range, both were great at scream-singing (e.g., ‘Long tall Sally’, ‘Oh Darling’ for Paul, ‘Bad Boy’, ‘Yer Blues’ for John), but there was a tonal depth to John’s voice that gave it a hauntingly beautiful quality (e.g., ‘Strawberry Fields”, ‘Julia’).
Who had the better voice McCartney or Lennon?
Paul McCartney is the most technically accomplished singer in the band, his voice has wide range and sounds more refined. John Lennon was not really technically accomplished but he was a good singer, although his voice sounds rather too nasal and a bit rough.
Which Beatle had the best singing voice?
John and George are a bit flat and Ringo’s voice is… well… it’s Ringo. I’d have to say John because raw John Lennon (1963-era Lennon) has one of the best voices ever recorded, period. Paul was more versatile but I prefer John’s. George had the best singing voice but Paul was the best singer.
Who sold more albums Queen or The Beatles?
| ARTIST | COMBINED SALES TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BEATLES | 22.1 MILLION |
| 2 | QUEEN | 12.8 MILLION |
| 3 | ABBA | 11.3 MILLION |
| 4 | ROLLING STONES | 10.1 MILLION |
Who was better Rolling Stones or Beatles?
During an interview with Howard Stern earlier this month, McCartney agreed with the host’s opinion that the Beatles were superior to the Stones. “[The Stones] are rooted in the blues. When they are writing stuff, it has to do with the blues. We had a little more influences,” McCartney noted.
Does Mick Jagger like The Beatles?
While the media loved pitting The Beatles against the Rolling Stones, the members of the two bands were very friendly with one another in the ’60s. If you attended the “happening” that was the orchestra recording session for “A Day in the Life” (1967), you’d have found Mick Jagger there.
Who is older Beatles or Rolling Stones?
Answer: The Beatles were officially formed in Liverpool in 1960, whilst The Rolling Stones were formed in London in 1962.
Did The Beatles and the Stones get along?
“We went through some pretty strange times,” Mick Jagger shared while inducting the Beatles into the Rock And Roll Hall of Fame in 1988. “We had a sort of — a lot of rivalry in those early years, and a little bit of friction, but we always ended up friends.
Did Mick Jagger and John Lennon get along?
In real-life, the two bands were very friendly with one another when they got their start in London in the early ’60s. Years later, John Lennon spoke about how he admired the Stones from the first time he saw them, and how much fun they had together in their salad days.
Is Mick Jagger in the Beatles?
The singer boycotted the event as the result of ongoing business disputes but Mick Jagger not only inducted the band with an exemplary speech and then played his part in a Beatles supergroup alongside George Harrison, Ringo Starr, Jeff Lynne, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan, Jeff Beck and Billy Joel — which unsurprisingly …
Is Pink Floyd better than the Beatles?
In terms of success the Beatles have sold 265 million albums to Pink Floyd’s 155 million. Personally I prefer Pink Floyd but I concede that the Beatles had a bigger influence on rock music.
Why Pink Floyd is the greatest band ever?
They were famed for their 20-minute opuses and grandiose stadium shows featuring flying pigs. Now Pink Floyd have received an accolade to match the enormity of their sound and performances – by being named the biggest band of all time, ahead of acts such as Led Zeppelin and the Rolling Stones.
What does paul McCartney think of Pink Floyd?
Paul McCartney in his turn was a big fan of Pink Floyd in their early days. He was spoted at Pink Floyd concerts at the Cavern a number of times. In his November, 1992 Musician interview Roger Waters said: “You can draw a line between what I’m interested in and what I’m not interested in.
Who is better Queen or Pink Floyd?
Both bands had great rhythm sections, though individually Queen’s John Deacon was a better bassist than Pink Floyd’s Roger waters. In my opinion, Pink FLoyd is more legendary than Queen.
What did the Rolling Stones think of Pink Floyd?
He likes music with boogie and groove. Mick Jagger used Mark Fisher to produce a big Stones concert, impressed by his work on the Wall. He said he liked the Wall show though Floyd’s music left him “a little cold” adding quickly that that was just “a personal take.”
What do the Beatles think of Pink Floyd?
They loved them. Pink Floyd was inspired by the Beatles and thought they were one of the best bands they knew of, despite the fact they were creating their first album at the same time the Beatles were doing their Sargeant Pepper’s album, and in the same studio.