How long does it take for a journal article to be accepted?

How long does it take for a journal article to be accepted?

3-4 weeks

How long does it take for a paper to be reviewed?

Normally, a peer review takes me 1 or 2 days, including reading the supporting information. I almost always do it in one sitting, anything from 1 to 5 hours depending on the length of the paper. In my experience, the submission deadline for reviews usually ranges between 3 working days to up to 3 weeks.

How long does it take to get an article peer reviewed?

within 80 days

How long does it take to publish a paper in a journal?

Like many people said already; Once you actually submitted your paper to a journal you need to expect it to take at least 2 months before it’s published – and that is if you’re not required to do any additional experiments for it.

What happens after peer review?

The peer review is completed once all the reviewers send the journal a detailed report with their comments on the manuscript and their recommendation. Typically, journals ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.

How does peer review process work?

Peer review has been defined as a process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. The major advantage of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication.

How long does it take to get a desk reject?

1 to 4 weeks

What is desk reject?

A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review.

Does decision in process mean rejection?

‘Decision in Process’ on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). A ‘Decision in Process’ soon after submission typically indicates that the manuscript is being desk-rejected.

What is the average rejection rate for the top journals?

What is the rejection rate of journals? Rejection rates range from 30%-90%. Journals with good to high standards have rejection rates of around 90%. Open-access journals tend to have lower rejection rates.

How often do papers get rejected?

At Cell, Nature and Science, out of every 100 submissions received, merely three make it through the editor’s review and then peer review. In other words, rejection rates in these journals are as high as 97 percent! Even at journals where screening is comparatively relaxed, acceptance rates rarely exceed 40 percent.

What is Journal acceptance rate?

Acceptance rate (or rejection rate) is the ratio of the number of articles submitted to the number of articles published. It can measure the selectivity or prestige of a journal, though like many journal metrics, the raw number is not the whole story.

How many steps are there in the typical peer review process?

10 steps

What is a problem with peer review?

One pretty significant problem with peer review is that it may be prone to bias from the reviewers. Not only are women greatly underrepresented in the peer review process, but reviewers are much more likely to have a preference to work done by those that are the same gender as themselves.

What is the first step in an effective peer review?

The best way to structure your review is to: Open your review with the most important comments—a summarization of the research and your impression of the research. Make sure to include feedback on the strengths, as well as the weaknesses, of the manuscript.

What should I write in a peer review?

Do

• Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.
• Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve.
• Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript.
• Be professional and respectful.
• Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!

What do peer reviewers look for?

Reviewers look for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness of the manuscript that can greatly affect the chances of publishing your research. Apart from these, reviewers check for the scientific merits of the manuscript, its methods, and research misconduct (if any).

Are peer-reviewed journals credible?

Peer-reviewed journal articles are usually considered the most reliable sources. Peer-reviewers are always experts in the same field as the author of the article in question. Peer-reviewers submit comments that the author must comply with to have his or her article published in that particular journal.

What are the best peer reviewed journals?

The Journals

1. Annual Review of Psychology.
2. Frontiers in Neuroscience.
3. PLOS One.
4. Journal of Advertising Research.
5. Journal of Consumer Research.
6. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
7. Learning and Instruction.
8. CHI.

How do you know a journal is credible?

The credibility of a journal may be assessed by examining several key factors:

1. Where is it indexed? Is the journal included or indexed in the major bibliographic databases for the field?
2. What is its publishing history? How long has the journal been available?
3. Is it peer-reviewed?
4. What is its impact factor?

Is Popular Science a credible source?

Popular Science is not credible, but they don’t really set out to be. In order to make stuff interesting for the masses, you have to sensationalize things to a great degree. Not as sensationalist as New Scientist or some of that other bullcrap, but still. SciAm is where it’s at.