How long does it take to publish in PLOS ONE?
The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. The following decision types are available: Reject.
Is Plos One a legitimate journal?
OCLC no. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine.
Is PNAS reputable?
PNAS is the second most cited scientific journal, with more than 1.9 million cumulative citations from 2008 to 2018. In the mass media, PNAS has been described variously as “prestigious”, “sedate”, “renowned”, and “high impact”.
Is it hard to publish in PNAS?
Its impact factor is less than that of Science but nonetheless it is highly competitive. Publishing in PNAS is not an easy job even if you think your work is good enough. In general Science publishes strikingly novel work while Nature usually publishes extensive work.
How long does it take for PNAS review?
More than 50% of Direct Submissions are declined by the Editorial Board without additional review, within 2 weeks on average. For papers that are sent on to an editor and reviewers, the average time to receive a decision is 45 days. If accepted, authors have their articles published as soon as 4 weeks after acceptance.
How much does it cost to publish in PNAS?
Publication Fees Regular research articles: $1,380 per article up to 6 pages, with no additional fees for color figures or SI. Any fraction of a page over 6 and up to 9 will cost an additional $375 per page, and any fraction of a page over 9 and up to 12 will cost an additional $500 per page.
Is 4 a good impact factor?
In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1.
Is Nature Communication prestigious?
Nevertheless, Nature, Nature Genetics, and Nature Communications are all very highly regarded. Scientific Reports is fine but a paper there is much less likely, in itself, to make your career.
Is nature a good journal?
Nature was one of the world’s most cited scientific journals by the Science Edition of the 2019 Journal Citation Reports (with an ascribed impact factor of 42.778), making it one of the world’s most-read and most prestigious academic journals.
Is nature a journal or magazine?
Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is an international publishing company that publishes academic journals, magazines, online databases, and services in science and medicine. NPG’s flagship publication is Nature, a prestigious weekly multidisciplinary journal first published in 1869.
What type of journal is nature?
Nature Communications is an open access journal publishing original research in all areas of the biological, chemical and physical sciences through a rapid, yet rigorous, peer-review process managed by an in house editorial team of professional editors.
What are Nature partner journals?
Nature Partner Journals adopt a modified set of Nature editorial standards, bringing together strong editorial leadership with world-class publication systems to deliver high-quality, peer-reviewed original research to the global scientific community.
How much does it cost to publish in nature?
From 2021, the publisher will charge €9,500, US$11,390 or £8,290 to make a paper open access (OA) in Nature and 32 other journals that currently keep most of their articles behind paywalls and are financed by subscriptions.
How long does it take to publish in nature?
At Nature, the median review time has grown from 85 days to just above 150 days over the past decade, according to Himmelstein’s analysis, and at PLoS ONE it has risen from 37 to 125 days over roughly the same period.
Is it hard to publish in nature?
It may sound like a riddle—but according to a new study, it is in fact getting harder to publish in prestigious multidisciplinary journals such as Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences if you haven’t previously done so.
Can we add authors after acceptance?
It’s possible to change the author list after acceptance, but the editors will be suspicious and will ask for an explanation of why nothing unethical is going on. I assume you discussed authorship with your advisor when you submitted the paper, and both of you approved of the author list at the time of submission.
How long does it take for a paper to get accepted?
Daniel Himmelstein of the University of California, San Francisco, analyzed submission and acceptance dates for all papers indexed in the PubMed database and found that the median time between submission and acceptance has been roughly 100 days for the past 30 years.
How long does it take to peer review a paper?
Normally, a peer review takes me 1 or 2 days, including reading the supporting information. I almost always do it in one sitting, anything from 1 to 5 hours depending on the length of the paper. In my experience, the submission deadline for reviews usually ranges between 3 working days to up to 3 weeks.
What is submission to first decision?
Time to First Decision: From submission to first decision, the journal aims to provide authors with a quick decision. Reviewers are given a tight deadline to review the manuscript. In most cases, the decision is made in less than three months.
How long is a paper under review?
In general, peer review can take anywhere between a few weeks to even 6 months. However, if the status does not change even after two months, you can perhaps send a polite inquiry to the Editor requesting a status update.
What is the difference between in review and under review?
One uses in review when the purpose is simply to recollect or remember events. One uses under review when the purpose is to critically scrutinize events- for example to find fault or establish innocence. In review is going through the past in a flash. Under review is to assess something.