Is thrilled a past participle?
The past tense of thrill is thrilled. The third-person singular simple present indicative form of thrill is thrills. The present participle of thrill is thrilling. The past participle of thrill is thrilled.
What tense is found?
past tense
Can be found or find?
“Find” is an infinitive form of verb meaning “to discover by searching, to obtain”. “Found” could be: past tense/past participle form of “find”; an infinitive form of verb with meaning “to melt (metal) and pour into a mold; make (objects) by pouring molten material into a mold.”.
Did he find or found?
Because the helper verb “did” makes it past tense already. Therefore, you do not need to also use “found,” which is the past tense form of the verb “to find.” Use one form of past tense or the other, but do not use BOTH!
Did she find or found?
Yes, in such questions you should use the verb do. Note that after do you should use the bare form of the verb: find, not found. The verb do carries the Past Tense, being transformed into did, so there’s no need for find to carry the Past Tense too. The two verbs work together, after all.
Could found or could find?
“Found” could be: past tense/past participle form of “find”; an infinitive form of verb with meaning “to melt (metal) and pour into a mold; make (objects) by pouring molten material into a mold.”. ‘I could not find it’ is correct because the bare infinitive ‘find’ is used after the modal verb ‘could’.
What is difference between found and find?
3 Answers. If you presume they have already looked at the list, use “found”. If you would like them to review the list, but they haven’t done so, use “find”.
What I found or what I have found?
It’s correct to say, “I found the map,” (past tense) if one is directly reporting that event as it happened in the past, no matter how recent or distant. “I have found the map” (present perfect tense) indicates the map has just been found, or was found in the not-too-distant past; it conveys an air of finality.