What addition to the US Constitution was suggested as a way to win the approval of many of its opponents?
The bill of rights
What are two reasons why the Anti Federalists opposed the Constitution?
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.
Why did Patrick Henry oppose ratification of the new constitution quizlet?
Patrick Henry? Anti-Federalist, opposed ratification of the Constitution because it did not have a Bill of Rights. Papers written to help [achieve ratification] persuade states to ratify the U. S. Constitution?
Who were the opponents to having a constitution without a Bill of Rights Why did they want the Bill of Rights quizlet?
The Anti Federalists feared that the national government would become too powerful and limit personal rights. The Anti Federalists insisted on a Bill of Rights added to the US Constitution to protect citizens’ rights.
Why did the Federalists oppose a bill of rights do you agree?
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
What did the Federalist Papers argue?
The authors of the Federalist papers argued against the decentralization of political authority under the Articles of Confederation. Broadly, they argued that the government’s impotence under the Articles of Confederation obstructed America’s emergence as a powerful commercial empire.
Did the Federalist Papers help ratify the Constitution?
The Federalist, also called The Federalist Papers, has served two very different purposes in American history. The 85 essays succeeded by helping to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution.