What consequences should be faced by correctional officers who violate ethical codes of conduct?
Corrections officers who are found to be in violation of the code, or any of its provisions, are sanctioned accordingly. Gross violations have harsher punishments, not excluding forced resignation or dismissal (usually for administrative cases), and court action (especially if the breaches involve criminal offenses).
Why are ethics important in corrections?
Because of the importance of the correctional system in protecting the public from dangerous criminals, correctional officer codes of ethics and conduct emphasize the value of public service. Correctional officers and other prison employees also are required to preserve the integrity of confidential information.
What are the four ethical justifications for corrections?
Legal scholars have traditionally identified four major objectives or justifications for the practice of punishing criminals: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation.
Which of the following is key to preventing ethical abuses?
The development of codes of ethics, profressionalization of staff, and the routinization of policies and procedures are all key to preventing ethical abuses.
Which ethical system is concerned with whether the act itself is good?
Deontological ethical systems: systems concerned with whether the act itself is good. Teleological ethical systems: systems focused on whether the consequences of the act are good.
What makes an action utilitarian?
Utilitarianism holds that an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce sadness, or the reverse of happiness—not just the happiness of the actor but that of everyone affected by it.
Which is the earliest known written code of punishment?
Code of Hammurabi: The earliest known written code of punishment. Babylonian law of equal retaliation.
Is there any evidence in this document that can be used to argue that Hammurabi’s code was not just?
How can you use this document to argue that Hammurabi’s code was not just? Law 195/129 you can argue that they are just because in law 129 Hammurabi is protecting the girl that was being cheated on. In law 195 it is fair because he is protecting the father. Two crimes in the document result in physical punishment.
Which of the following is one of the central themes of Corrections?
One of the constant themes in corrections is that money, or a lack thereof, is a factor in virtually all correctional policy decisions. Prisons and other such institutions serve as a social control mechanism.
What term referred to Babylonian law of equal retaliation?
Eye for an eye, in law and custom, the principle of retaliation for injuries or damages. In ancient Babylonian, biblical, Roman, and Islāmic law, it was a principle operative in private and familial settlements, intended to limit retaliation, and often satisfied by a money payment or other equivalent.
What is lex talionis means?
Talion, Latin lex talionis, principle developed in early Babylonian law and present in both biblical and early Roman law that criminals should receive as punishment precisely those injuries and damages they had inflicted upon their victims. Many early societies applied this “eye-for-an-eye” principle literally.
What is lex talionis also called?
Lex talionis, also known as the law of retribution (“tooth for a tooth, eye for an eye”), is one of the world’s most recognizable legal concepts.
What is the principle of retaliation?
“An eye for an eye” (Biblical Hebrew: עַ֚יִן תַּ֣חַת עַ֔יִן) or the law of retaliation (Latin: lex talionis) is the principle that a person who has injured another person is to be penalized to a similar degree by the injured party.
Which group of religions is monotheistic *?
Monotheism is the belief in a single all-powerful god, as opposed to religions that believe in multiple gods. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are widely practiced forms of monotheism.
Why is eye for an eye wrong?
“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life…” is located in the sections of the Bible that instruct judges how to punish criminals. An eye for an eye means that the punishment should fit the crime. If it doesn’t, it is immoral and is therefore likely to cause more harm than good.
What law has the lex talionis principle?
The expression “lex talionis” comes from the first compilation of the Roman law, written in 450 BC and known as the Twelve Tables and written: “If a man has broken the limb of another man, unless he makes his peace with him, there shall be like for like, talio esto.”
What is the law of retribution?
Retribution is based on the concept of lex talionis—that is, the law of retaliation. At its core is the principle of equal and direct retribution, as expressed in Exodus 21:24 as “an eye for an eye.” Destroying the eye of a person of equal social standing meant that one’s own eye would be put out.
How many laws consist The Code of Hammurabi?
282 rules
What does Hammurabi’s code say?
Hammurabi’s Code is one of the most famous examples of the ancient precept of “lex talionis,” or law of retribution, a form of retaliatory justice commonly associated with the saying “an eye for an eye.” Under this system, if a man broke the bone of one his equals, his own bone would be broken in return.
Why is Hammurabi’s Code unfair?
Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because the punishments were too harsh for ignorant people’s wrong doings, also gave the government a lot of power, and they had no chance to debate for justice.
What should be done about a wife who ignores her duties and belittles her husband?
SITUATION #3: What should be done about a wife who ignores her duties and belittles her husband? Hammurabi’s Code # 143: If the woman has not been careful but has gadded about, neglecting her house and belittling her husband, they shall throw that woman into the water.
Whose eye was worth the most?
It seems as though not everyone’s “eye” was considered equal. Laws 196-198 show us that the eye of “another man” was probably worth more than the eye of a free man or a slave. If you put out the eye of another man, you had to pay with your own eye. If you put out the eye of a free man, you had to pay a fine.