What did the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrate about social roles?
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated the power of social roles, norms, and scripts in affecting human behavior. The guards and prisoners enacted their social roles by engaging in behaviors appropriate to the roles: The guards gave orders and the prisoners followed orders.
How does the Stanford Prison Experiment relate to the real world?
The Stanford Prison Experiment was designed to spotlight the real impact of a typical-for-the-time prison situation for both guards and prisoners. What it did was show the world how broken, and how dangerous, the system truly is, and what people are capable of within its structure of power and powerlessness.
What were the effects of the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The guards began to behave in ways that were aggressive and abusive toward the prisoners while the prisoners became passive and depressed. Five of the prisoners began to experience severe negative emotions, including crying and acute anxiety, and had to be released from the study early.
What did the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrate quizlet?
Results of this experiment showed the behaviour of normal, well educated men can be dramatically affected when a role they are given involves considerable power an status. A generalisation that can be made is the treatment of prisoners in real prisons.
What can be a downside to mimicry?
What can be a downside of mimicry? doing something that goes against your morals or feeling mad, sad, ect.
Why was the Stanford experiment unethical?
As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would escalate to the point of abuse that it did. It’s hard to perceive the whole process,” Zimbardo said.
What was unethical about the Milgram experiment?
The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people. The participants were unaware that the learner was an associate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that deception was necessary to produce the desired outcomes of the experiment.