What does a systematic review protocol include?
A systematic review protocol describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review. It should be prepared before a review is started and used as a guide to carry out the review.
What is a protocol review?
The review protocol sets out the methods to be used in the review. Decisions about the review question, inclusion criteria, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, data synthesis and plans for dissemination should be addressed.
What is a scoping review protocol?
The scoping review represents an appropriate methodology for reviewing large bodies of literature in order to generate an overview of research undertaken on a topic and determine the range of studies that are available, summarise research results and identify evidence gaps.
What is the difference between a scoping review and a systematic review?
Subsequently, a scoping review seeks to present an overview of a potentially large and diverse body of literature pertaining to a broad topic, whereas a systematic review attempts to collate empirical evidence from a relatively smaller number of studies pertaining to a focused research question (Arksey and O’Malley.
Where can I publish a scoping review protocol?
Scoping Review Steps Journals that publish scoping review protocols include BMJ Open and Systematic Reviews, among others. You can also search for registered protocols by review collaborations such as the Joanna Briggs Institute.
How do you write a scoping review?
The scoping review process
- Step 1 – Define a clear review topic, objective and sub-questions.
- Step 2 – Develop a protocol.
- Step 3 – Apply PCC framework.
- Step 4 – Conduct systematic searches (including grey literature)
- Step 5 – Screen results for studies that meet your eligibility criteria.
How do I do a rapid review?
A rapid review (or rapid evidence assessment) is a variation of a systematic review that balances time constraints with considerations in bias.
- Step 1: Form/refine Question.
- Step 2: Define Parameters.
- Step 3: Identify Biases.
- Step 4: Plan & Execute Search.
- Step 5: Screen & Select.
- Step 6: Quality Appraisal.
How do I start a scoping session?
- Step 1: Prepare. Clarify the scope of the engagement as well as the key stakeholders in the process.
- Step 2: Execute. Review the objectives, boundaries, and agenda at the beginning of the session.
- Step 3: Follow Up. Follow up on open action items and parking lot items.
How long does it take to do a scoping review?
Thorough, thoughtful scoping reviews take time (Daudt et al., 2013). Authors have reported that this type of review has taken up to 20 months to complete (Pham et al., 2014).
How long does it take to complete a systematic review?
How Long Does a Systematic Review Take? Systematic reviews are work and time intensive! Estimates of the average time to conduct a systematic review range from 6-18 months (Source).
How do you do a Cochrane review?
How do I get started?
- Decide on your topic for a review.
- Make sure your proposal does not duplicate any work already published or registered with Cochrane.
- Identify a team of authors for your review.
- Identify the CRG that is most relevant to your topic of interest.
- Make contact with the CRG.
How do you choose a topic for a systematic review?
TO DO LIST
- Choose a topic.
- Make sure you can phrase your topic as an answerable question.
- Review the existing literature to check what has been done on your topic already.
- Decide which types of documents you will and will not include in your systematic review to create your inclusion and exclusion criteria.
What is a systematic literature review and how do I do one?
A systematic literature review (SLR) identifies, selects and critically appraises research in order to answer a clearly formulated question (Dewey, A. & Drahota, A. 2016). The systematic review should follow a clearly defined protocol or plan where the criteria is clearly stated before the review is conducted.
When Why would you do a systematic review?
Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers.