What does Arnold say about Christianity in culture and anarchy?
Christianity, as he saw it, is like culture in that it also seeks to learn the will of God (human perfection) and make it prevail. In even sharper terms, culture is opposed to utilitarianism, which Arnold considered “mechanical” because it worshiped means rather than ends.
How does Arnold define culture?
ACCORDING TO ARNOLD Culture is, “Culture can be recommend as the great help out of present difficulties; culture being a pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which most concern us, “the best which has been thought and said in the world” and through this knowledge, turning a …
What does Arnold mean by philistines?
A person devoted narrow-mindedly to material prosperity at the expense of intellectual and artistic awareness; or (as an adjective) ignorantly uninterested in culture and ideas. Arnold usually applied the term ‘the Philistines’ to the prosperous bourgeoisie, especially to its nonconformist Liberal representatives.
What does Arnold mean by machinery?
Arnold in narration. Machinery is metaphorical here. Arnold is not discussing actual machines; this is not a diatribe against the Industrial Revolution. Machinery is the opposite of culture; it is the propaganda of an assumption of truth not as they actually are but as one wishes to believe them to be.
How does Arnold define state?
Arnold’s Function of the State Light, as Arnold defines it, is intelligence as a component of perfection. Arnold is worth quoting directly here, ‘Our prevalent notion is . . . that it is a most happy and important thing for a man merely to be able to do as he likes.
How does Arnold evaluate hebraism in comparison to Hellenism?
Arnold gave his opinion that, the nation is energy or the capacity of doing but it is not intelligence or capacity of thinking rightly. Thus, Hellenism acquires spontaneity of consciousness with a clearness of mind, and Hebraism achieves a strictness of conscience with its clarity of thought.
What is hebraism and Hellenism?
An unclouded clearness of mind, an unimpeded play of thought, is what this bent drives at. The governing idea of Hellenism is spontaneity of consciousness ; that of Hebraism, strictness of conscience. Both Hellenism and Hebraism arise out of the wants of the human nature, and address themselves to satisfy those wants.
Which concept of culture is given by Matthew Arnold?
concept of culture is obvious. Arnold emphasizes that the process of culture is the development of all sides of human nature. Culture aims at harmonious and total perfection. Education, in Arnold’s theory, serves culture by being concerned that students aim at this total perfection.
What does According to Arnold the man of culture aim at?
Culture aims at the perfection, which is harmonious, perfection in which both beauty and intelligence are present, a perfection, which unites the two noblest of things, namely sweetness and light. And Arnold says that culture is internal thing. …
Who wrote the use of poetry and the use of criticism?
T. S. Eliot
Who challenged Matthew Arnold?
Yeats
Why did Matthew Arnold Write Dover Beach?
Dover Beach is Matthew Arnold’s best known poem. Written in 1851 it was inspired by two visits he and his new wife Frances made to the south coast of England, where the white cliffs of Dover stand, just twenty two miles from the coast of France.
What are the major influence on Arnold?
He was raised in a very liberal Anglican household, yet was heavily influenced by John Henry Newman, who was a very important figure in the church at the time. Arnold highly respected Newman, a conservative Catholic, for his spirituality, Arnold became an agnostic later in life.
Which poetic work does Matthew Arnold do?
Matthew Arnold | |
---|---|
Period | Victorian |
Genre | Poetry; literary, social and religious criticism |
Notable works | “Dover Beach”, “The Scholar-Gipsy”, “Thyrsis”, Culture and Anarchy, Literature and Dogma |
Spouse | Frances Lucy |
How does Matthew Arnold define poetry?
Poetry according to Matthew Arnold: According to Matthew Arnold, poetry is “simply the most delightful and perfect form of utterance that human words can reach”; It is, “a criticism of life under the conditions fixed for such a criticism by the laws of poetic truth and poetic beauty.”
How does Arnold define criticism?
According to Arnold, criticism should be a “dissemination of ideas, an unprejudiced and impartial effort to study and spread the best that is known and thought in the world.” His definition of criticism therefor likens it to a sort of judgement in which the critic uses his (or her) special knowledge and training to …
How did Arnold leave a permanent impression on modern criticism?
Arnold has been taken to task for some of his judgments and omissions: for his judgment that Dryden and Pope were not “genuine” poets because they composed in their wits instead of “in the soul”; for calling Gray a “minor classic” in an age of prose and spiritual bleakness; for paying too much attention to the man …
What does Arnold mean by disinterestedness?
Disinterestedness: Matthew Arnold’s ideal critic is disinterested. In other words, a piece of literature should be examined on its own merits, without interference from the critic’s own beliefs or values. Arnold further says that when evaluating a work, the aim is to see “the object as in itself it really is”.
What according to Eliot is the function of criticism?
Eliot argues that the function of criticism is “elucidation of works of art and the correction of taste.” He sees criticism as an impersonal process, and argues that rather than expressing a critic’s emotions about or impressions of a work, criticism is grounded in fact.
What is new criticism as a literary theory?
New Criticism was a formalist movement in literary theory that dominated American literary criticism in the middle decades of the 20th century. It emphasized close reading, particularly of poetry, to discover how a work of literature functioned as a self-contained, self-referential aesthetic object.
Who has composed the essay the function of criticism?
Eliot’s essay “The Function of Criticism” (1923) is a work of angry intelligence: it reads as if it were written under duress.