What if the Supreme Court did not have the power to interpret the Constitution?
What if the Supreme Court did not have the power to interpret the Constitution? If the Supreme Court didn’t have the power to interpret the Constitution then it would be a free-for-all for anyone who can abuse the proclamations stated in the Constitution including the Amendments. The Bill of Rights1.
Why should the Supreme Court have the power of judicial review?
Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution.
Who has final say in interpreting the Constitution?
U.S. Supreme Court
What is the most important device the courts use to interpret the Constitution?
Court uses to interpret the Constitution is judicial review. Although the principle of judicial review is well established, people continue to disagree over how the court should use this power.
What would happen if the checks and balances system was not in place?
If the government did not have this system the different branches of government would not be able to work together to maintain a stable government. If one branch of government had total control or more control over another branch it would not be constitutional.
What does the Constitution say about judicial review?
The text of the Constitution does not contain a specific provision for the power of judicial review. Rather, the power to declare laws unconstitutional has been deemed an implied power, derived from Article III and Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.
Did the court actually gave itself the power of judicial review?
Although the Court’s opinion in Marbury established judicial review in American federal law, it did not create or invent it. This power has been the basis of many subsequent important Supreme Court decisions in American history, such as the 1974 case United States v.