What is one similarity between the economy of the Chesapeake colonies and the economy of the middle colonies?

Both the economies of the middle colonies and Chesapeake were based on agricultural production for export. Both the middle and Chesapeake colonies had to pay taxes to England (the response must mention either the Navigation Acts or the mercantilist system).

What was the New England economies based on?

New England’s economy was built on small farms, lumbering, fishing, shipbuilding, and trade. A region’s economy is how the people use their resources to sustain themselves. Most New England colonists were originally Puritans.

What was the Chesapeake colonies economy based on?

Economics in the colonies: Both the Chesapeake and Southern colonies had rich soil and temperate climates which made large-scale plantation farming possible. Both regions had an agriculture-based economy in which cash crops like tobacco, indigo, and cotton were cultivated for trade.

What is one difference between the economy of British North American colonies in the Chesapeake region and the economy of the middle colonies?

A difference between the economy of Chesapeake colonies and the economy of the middle colonies was the use of labor for their agricultural production. In Chesapeake, the large-scale plantations for cash crops promoted the use of slavery and they began to import massive amounts of African Americans.

What were the most important differences between the Chesapeake colonies and New England?

The New England colonies were strictly Puritan whereas the Chesapeake colonies followed no universal religion; also, while the New England colonies relied on fishing, shipbuilding, and farming, the Chesapeake colonies relied on their strong tobacco based economy.

Why did the Chesapeake colonies come to America?

England had experienced a dramatic rise in population in the sixteenth century, and the colonies appeared a welcoming place for those who faced overcrowding and grinding poverty at home. Thousands of English migrants arrived in the Chesapeake Bay colonies of Virginia and Maryland to work in the tobacco fields.

How was slavery in the Chesapeake region?

Slavery in the Chesapeake region began in 1619, when a Dutch trading vessel carrying 20 African men entered Jamestown, Virginia. The slave trade expanded in the following years. Between 1700 and 1770, the region’s slave population grew from 13,000 to 250,000.

What year did the first African slaves arrive in Jamestown?

1619

Where did the African slaves come from?

The majority of all people enslaved in the New World came from West Central Africa. Before 1519, all Africans carried into the Atlantic disembarked at Old World ports, mainly Europe and the offshore Atlantic islands.

When were African slaves first brought to the colonies?

Was there any slavery in Canada?

Slavery itself was abolished everywhere in the British Empire in 1834. In 1793 Upper Canada (now Ontario) passed the Anti‐slavery Act. The law freed enslaved people aged 25 and over and made it illegal to bring enslaved people into Upper Canada.

What is one similarity between the economy of the Chesapeake colonies and the economy of the middle colonies?

Which of the following was a similarity between the Encomienda system and slavery in the Spanish colonies?

Which of the following was a similarity between the encomienda system and slavery in the Spanish colonies? The Spanish used both labor systems for plantation agriculture as well as for mining in their American colonies.

How were Chesapeake and New England colonies similar?

What is the difference between the economy of British North American colonies in the Chesapeake region and the economy of the middle colonies?

In the Chesapeake region, the economy was based off of agriculture, or more specifically cash crops. A difference between the economy of Chesapeake colonies and the economy of the middle colonies was the use of labor for their agricultural production.

What made the Chesapeake colony so unhealthy?

What made the Chesapeake colony so unhealthy? Malaria, dysentery, and typhoid were brought because of immigration from England. Characterize the population that existed in both Maryland and Virginia by 1700s. You just studied 22 terms!

What made life in the Chesapeake area difficult?

Difficult Lives Spurred by tobacco profits, Chesapeake settlement grew rapidly. Most immigrants were Europeans. But by the late 1660s, more and more Africans were brought to the region. As a cash crop, tobacco brought prosperity, at the cost of human suffering.

What was the most significant difference between the Chesapeake and New England colonies between 1607 to 1732?

The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops.

For what primary purpose did the Spanish enslave many American Indians?

Answer: The Spanish conquistadors enslaved American Indians because they needed labour to work in mines and grow sugar. Slavery in the Spanish American colonies was an economic and social institution which existed throughout the empire of Spain.

Where was the Encomienda system used?

The encomienda system was put in place in several areas, most importantly in Peru. Under the encomienda system, prominent Spaniards were entrusted with Native Peruvian communities. In exchange for the stolen labor of Indigenous people and tribute, the Spanish lord would provide protection and education.

Why was the Encomienda system used?

Why is the encomienda system so important? The encomienda system allowed for a vast accumulation of wealth by the conquistadors and the Spanish crown. They benefited from the discovery of gold and silver in the New World, and the mining of those metals by their laborers.

What was the main result of the Encomienda system?

Cause & Effect: The cause of the Encomienda system was the Spanish crown offering land and Indian slaves to conquistadors going to the new world. The effect was heavy depopulation of Indians from brutality and disease leading into African slaves becoming a new labor force. Ended hunger in many countries.

Who ended the Encomienda system?

The encomienda system was generally replaced by the crown-managed repartimiento system throughout Spanish America after mid-sixteenth century.

Why did African slavery replace the Encomienda system?

8. What replaced the Encomienda System? It was gradually replaced by African slave labor because Africans were more immune to European diseases than Natives.

Why did African slavery replace Native American slavery on the Encomienda system quizlet?

Why did African slavery replace Native American slavery on the Encomienda System? Americans had home field advantage, British supplies was far away, strong motivation to fight, and George Washington.

When did the Encomienda system stop?

In 1542, due to the constant protests of Las Casas and others, the Council of the Indies wrote and King Charles V enacted the New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians. The New Laws abolished Indian slavery and also ended the encomienda system.

What were the actual effects of the Encomienda system in the real world?

What were the actual effects of the Encomienda System in the real world? It caused Spanish culture and religion to spread throughout the New World. It helped native peoples to become happy and wealthy and share their cultures freely and equally with Europeans.

What were the long term consequences of Spain abolished the Encomienda system?

the long term consequence of this action was that the United States once again belonged to its original inhabitants for the next 12 years. what was the long term consequence of the Spanish abolishing the encomienda system? the buying and selling of Africans for work in the americas.

What were the Encomienda and Repartimiento systems?

The actual land given to deserving subjects by the Spanish Crown are the encomiendas while the distribution of the labor force, the Indians, is referred to as the repartimiento. Along with the land, these “encomenderos” were allotted the Native people of the land as the labor force to work the land.

What was one similarity between the Encomienda and Repartimiento?

What was one similarity between the encomienda and repartimiento systems of Spanish colonial America? Both encouraged American Indians to become loyal Spanish subjects. Both helped American Indians by providing them with food and shelter. Both forced American Indians to work for colonists as farmers and miners.

What were the rules of the Repartimiento?

Repartimiento, (Spanish: “partition,” “distribution”) also called mita, or cuatequil, in colonial Spanish America, a system by which the crown allowed certain colonists to recruit indigenous peoples for forced labour.

What was the difference between the Encomienda system and the Repartimiento system?

The encomienda was a permanent institution for the agrarian colonial sector aimed at “hispanising” the natives in more remote areas with a few Spaniards in charge, while the repartimiento was a temporary system with specific uses and no structural function.

What was the Mita system?

The mita system was a system established by the Inca Empire in order to construct buildings or create roads throughout the empire. It was later transformed into a coercive labor system when the Spanish conquered the Inca Empire.

How did the Encomienda system benefit Spain quizlet?

How did the encomienda system benefit Spain? It forced American Indians to work on farms and in mines. The treaty kept Portugal out of most of the Americas.

Who wrote the Laws of Burgos?

Fray Antonio de Montesinos

Who wrote The New Laws of the Indies?

The New Laws of the Indies (1542) of Charles I, which sought to correct the inadequacies of the previous code, met with armed resistance from the American colonists and were reissued in a weaker version in 1552.

Why was the law of Burgos passed?

Spanish-Indian relations The Laws of Burgos issued on Dec. 27, 1512, by Ferdinand II, the Catholic, regulated relations between Spaniards and the conquered Indians, particularly to ensure the spiritual and material welfare of the latter, who were often severely treated.

What were the Laws of the Indies and how were they supposed to protect native peoples?

The Laws of Burgos (1512), signed by King Ferdinand II of Aragon, focused upon the welfare of the conquered native peoples. These were followed by the Ordinances Concerning Discoveries in 1573, which forbade any unauthorized operations against independent Native Americans.