What is the perspective of the most dangerous game?
“The Most Dangerous Game” is narrated by a third-person limited omniscient narrator. For the most part, the reader views the events of the story through the perspective of Rainsford, the man being hunted by General Zaroff.
Whats the central idea of the most dangerous game?
murder
What is an allusion in The Most Dangerous Game?
Again Zaroff provides an allusion to his country’s past: After the debacle in Russia I left the country, for it was imprudent for an officer of the Tsar to stay there. Zaroff alludes to the Russian Revolution in 1917, during which time the Romanov czars were forcibly removed from power after the Bolshevik rebellion.
Why does zaroff think Rainsford is droll and naïve?
Zaroff thinks Rainford droll and naive as Zaroff thinks himself as the superior most Hunter and all others to be far below him. EXPLANATION: In the story ‘The most Dangerous Game’ by Richard Connel Zaroff is a unique character. He lives in an island in majestic lavishness.
Did Rainsford kill zaroff?
In the end, Rainsford is able to beat Zaroff by killing him. Rainsford is able to escape capture by making Zaroff think that he died. Rainsford returns to Zaroff’s castle, surprises him, and kills him. Therefore, Rainsford wins the game by exterminating Zaroff.
Why does Rainsford repeat the word nerve?
What does Rainsford’s repetition of the word “nerve” reveal about his character? A. Rainsford’s repetition characterizes him as forgetful and blundering, which is why he must repeat the word to remember his mission. Rainsford’s repetition shows that it is his courage and ability to reason that enables him to survive.
What does zaroff mean when he nods to Ivan?
What does Zaroff mean when he nods to Ivan? He is threatening Rainsford to join him as he hunts other people. He is giving Rainsford the choice to join his hunt or be hurt by Ivan, which is the choice he gives his other victims.
How does Rainsford resourceful?
Rainsford is extremely resourceful and uses various materials from the surrounding area to fashion effective booby traps, which impede and harm the general. Rainsford is only armed with a hunting knife but manages to fashion a Malay mancatcher, a Burmese tiger pit, and a deadly trap he learned to make in Uganda.
What experience of hunting has Rainsford had?
What experience in hunting has Rainsford had? He travels a lot to go hunting and has shot a lot. Writes books about hunting.
Is Rainsford a protagonist?
Rainsford is, by definition, the protagonist in this story. As the main character and conceptual “good guy,” Rainsford fills the role of protagonist well. The antagonist, in contrast, would be General Zaroff, as he is considered to be the adversary or “bad guy” in the context of the short story.
What happens to Rainsford at the beginning of the story?
As the story progresses, Rainsford experiences a ironic turn of events. As he finds his way to an island, he realizes that he, the hunter, for the first time in his life will be the hunted. This gives him perspective. He learns to fear.
Who does Rainsford meet first?
Ivan
How does Rainsford justify killing animals?
i do not think he will remain a hunter because he experienced what it feels like to be hunted like an animal. how does rainsford justify killing animals? general zaroff justify killing men by not thinking of it as murder but thinking that he is one of the strong and he wants to use his gift on the weak.
Where is Rainsford yacht headed for?
“The Most Dangerous Game” opens with a conversation between two men, Whitney and Rainsford. The pair are on a yacht headed to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. At the time of the story, they find themselves somewhere in the Caribbean. Both men are aficionados of big-game hunting.
How does Rainsford attitude towards hunting change during the story?
How does Rainsford’s attitude change because of his experience? He has more sympathy for the hunted, like Whitney. What do you think his future views on hunting will be? Since he now knew how it felt about how it was like being hunted, he feels more sympathetic towards the hunted.