What is the traditional attitude toward animals is it reasonable Why or why not?
The traditional attitude toward animals is that: An animal is merely a resource that humans may dispose of as they see fit; an animal has instrumental value only. To say that an animal has moral status is to say that: It is an object of direct oral consideration or concern, in and of itself.
Which philosopher helped engender the animal rights movement by arguing that something was very wrong with the traditional attitude toward animals and their treatment?
The philosopher who helped engender the animal rights movement by arguing that something was very wrong with the traditional attitude toward animals and their traditional attitude toward animals and their treatment is Peter Singer.
Which social policy in regard to animals is advocated by Tom Regan?
In The Case for Animal Rights, Regan argued that non-human animals bear moral rights. His philosophy aligns broadly within the tradition of Immanuel Kant, though he rejects Kant’s idea that respect is due only to rational beings.
Why does Tom Regan reject utilitarianism?
Unlike Singer, Regan argues against a utilitarianism perspective when considering animal equality. Utilitarianism has no room for the equal rights of different individuals because it has no room for their equal inherent value.
Why does Regan dismiss the cruelty kindness view?
Why does Regan reject the cruelty kindness view? We can be kind and still violate our moral duties. Also, even if we are not cruel, we can still violate our moral duties. Many people who perform abortions are not cruel.
What does Tom Regan say about animal rights?
Firstly, Regan argues that many kinds of non-human animals possess moral rights in virtue of their nature; in virtue of the fact that they are, as he puts it, subjects-of-a-life.
Are we moral animals?
No we are not “moral animals,” we are moral humans, and there is a difference. We are a kind of animal, specifically we are primates, and share much with other social mammals. The philosopher Aristotle set the stage for the way many people think about the relationship between human minds, morals, and other animals.
What are the three steps in coming to a moral judgment?
Requirements for Moral Judgments. Although there is no complete list of adequacy criteria for moral judgments, moral judgments should be (1) logical, (2) based on facts, and (3) based on sound or defensible moral principles.