What two events would the Cold War become violent conflicts?
World War II was followed by a Cold War that pitted the United States and its Allies against the Soviet Union and its supporters. It was called a Cold War, but it would flare into violence in Korea and Vietnam, in an effort to stops the spread of communism. It would also flare up in many smaller conflicts.
How did the Cold War lead to conflict?
The Cold War led to conflict because the world’s two chief powers did not trust each other and were committed to opposing the other side’s way of life. The Cold War was mostly a tension between these worldviews. There were also immediate conflicts and pressure points as the Cold War began.
Where did most of the Cold War conflicts occur?
The ideological warfare, however, involved the United States, Russia, Asia, Europe and parts of Africa and Latin America – especially Cuba. The one place the Cold War manifested physically was Korea, during the Korean Conflict from 1950-53.
What was a major outcome of the arms race during the Cold War?
The United States ended its commitment to containing. communism in Asia and Africa.
How did the Cold War affect the meanings of American freedom?
During the Cold War, the United States rarely encouraged and supported repressed colonial peoples throughout the world to strive for political freedom. Although the United States granted freedom to the Philippines in 1946, as the Cold War developed, the United States backed away from promoting global decolonization.
What did the United States do during the Cold War?
As the Soviets tightened their grip on Eastern Europe, the United States embarked on a policy of containment to prevent the spread of Soviet and communist influence in Western European nations such as France, Italy, and Greece.
How did the Cold War reshape ideas of American freedom?
During the Cold War, the idea of “totalitarianism” referred to countries that had aggressive government control of private life where there were no individual rights. This redefined the idea of American freedom by saying that freedom was the opposite of what Moscow describe as freedom.