What was the Supreme Court decision in Miranda v Arizona?
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Why was the Supreme Court case NY Times v Sullivan 1964 significant?
v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the Supreme Court reversed a libel damages judgment against the New York Times. This landmark decision constitutionalized libel law and arguably saved the civil rights movement.
Which US Supreme Court ruling created the case law that a person in police custody must be informed of his right to remain silent and right to an attorney prior to being interrogated which part of the US Constitution was being interpreted in this case?
Miranda rule A requirement that law enforcement officers inform a person subject to an interrogation of their right not to incriminate themselves under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments; created after the decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
What happened in New York Times vs Sullivan case which party won the case?
The Supreme Court held that news publications could not be liable for libel to public officials unless the plaintiff meets the exacting actual malice standard in the publication of the false statement. The Court’s decision for The Times was unanimous, 9–0.
What does the decision in New York v Sullivan 1964 say about libel and slander?
Sullivan (1964) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that First Amendment freedom of speech protections limit the ability of public officials to sue for defamation.
What was the legal significance of the Sullivan case quizlet?
The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 9, 1964, in The New York Times v. Sullivan that the Constitution prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood related to his official conduct.
What was the Brown vs Board of Education quizlet?
The ruling of the case “Brown vs the Board of Education” is, that racial segregation is unconstitutional in public schools. This also proves that it violated the 14th amendment to the constitution, which prohibits the states from denying equal rights to any person.
What was the result of the Brown case quizlet?
What was the result of Brown v Board of Education? The ruling meant that it was illegal to segregate schools and schools had to integrate. Supreme Court did not give a deadline by which schools had to integrate, which meant many states chose not to desegregate their schools until 1960’s.
Why did the Supreme Court overturn a precedent in deciding the Brown case quizlet?
The Supreme Court can hear any case it wants, but this would enable that defendant a fair trial after highest state court. This case overturned the precedent set in 1896 by stating that separate-but-equal was unconstitutional. This is the foundation for deciding cases.
What was the result of the Brown case?
In this milestone decision, the Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. It signaled the end of legalized racial segregation in the schools of the United States, overruling the “separate but equal” principle set forth in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case.