Which best describes how Tinker v Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment?

Which best describes how Tinker v Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment?

Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment? The decision affirmed the protection of unpopular opinions. The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.

Which of the following best describes the Tinker v Des Moines case and its outcome?

The case resulted in recognized that symbolic act is within the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Best describes the Tinker Case and it’s outcome. In Tinker v Des Moines students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War. The Supreme Court decides that the Tinkers were exercising free speech.

How did the Tinker vs Des Moines case expand the rights of minors?

Answer: The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The First Amendment protects the students’ right to wear the armbands; they weren’t disruptive, and the school allowed others to wear controversial symbols.

Why does Tinker v Des Moines remain an important?

Why does Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent-setting case? It protected all symbolic speech in war protests. It established speech rights for students.

What was the impact of Tinker v Des Moines?

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

What was the outcome of the Tinker v Des Moines case?

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s majority ruled that neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning …

Why did the Supreme Court agree to hear Tinker v Des Moines?

7–2 decision for Tinker The Supreme Court held that the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it. The Court also held that the students did not lose their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech when they stepped onto school property.

Did the Warren Court expand freedom of speech?

The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in US history. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.

How did the Warren Court affect the civil rights movement?

The Warren Court effectively ended racial segregation in U.S. public schools, expanded the constitutional rights of defendants, ensured equal representation in state legislatures, outlawed state-sponsored prayer in public schools, and paved the way for the legalization of abortion.

What were the strategies and achievements of the civil rights movement in the 1950s?

The most popular strategies used in the 1950s and first half of the 1960s were based on the notion of non-violent civil disobedience and included such methods of protest as boycotts, freedom rides, voter registration drives, sit-ins, and marches. A series of critical rulings and laws, from the 1954 Brown v.

How did the civil rights movement affect society?

One of the greatest achievements of the civil rights movement, the Civil Rights Act led to greater social and economic mobility for African-Americans across the nation and banned racial discrimination, providing greater access to resources for women, religious minorities, African-Americans and low-income families.

Can teachers take your phone away?

If you are using your phone in class, teachers can legally take it, especially if your teacher or the school in general has imposed a no-phone policy. This is because the act of using a phone during class or on campus despite a no-phone policy is a form of bad behavior the school or a teacher may want to stomp out.

Can teachers take your things?

School officials can only search you or your possessions if they have reasonable, individualized suspicion of your involvement in breaking a rule. They may also conduct a search if you voluntarily consent to their doing so.