Which of the following became secretary of state as part of the corrupt bargain of 1824 quizlet?
Which of the following best describes the “Corrupt Bargain” of 1824? Henry Clay helped John Quincy Adams win Congress’s vote for the presidency, so Adams made Clay the secretary of state.
Who was involved in the corrupt bargain of 1824?
Election of 1824 There were four candidates on the ballot: John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, Andrew Jackson, and William H. Crawford. Following the provisions of the Twelfth Amendment, however, only the top three candidates in the electoral vote were admitted as candidates, eliminating Henry Clay.
Who became secretary of state in 1824?
Henry Clay’s appointment as secretary of state, 7 March 1825. – In the presidential campaign of 1824 the candidates were John Quincy Adams (1767-1848), Henry Clay (1777-1852), William Harris Crawford (1772-1834), and Andrew Jackson (1767-1845).
What was the corrupt bargain of 1824 quizlet?
In the election of 1824, none of the candidates were able to secure a majority of the electoral vote, thereby putting the outcome in the hands of the House of Representatives, which elected John Quincy Adams over rival Andrew Jackson.
What was the corrupt bargain in simple terms?
When the 1824 election ended without any candidate receiving a majority in the electoral college, the House of Representatives awarded the election to John Quincy Adams.
What did the corrupt bargain refer to?
Denounced immediately as a “corrupt bargain” by supporters of Jackson, the antagonistic presidential race of 1828 began practically before Adams even took office. To Jacksonians the Adams-Clay alliance symbolized a corrupt system where elite insiders pursued their own interests without heeding the will of the people.
What is the best description of Jacksonian democracy?
Jacksonian democracy was a 19th-century political philosophy in the United States that expanded suffrage to most white men over the age of 21, and restructured a number of federal institutions.
What were government jobs based on under the spoils system?
In politics and government, a spoils system (also known as a patronage system) is a practice in which a political party, after winning an election, gives government civil service jobs to its supporters, friends (cronyism), and relatives (nepotism) as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep …
What are possible negative effects of the spoils system?
Critics said that the Spoils System led to corruption by federal officials. Bribes and special favors became lucrative during the future administrations. Political power was abused for the benefit of the ruling party. Public projects, franchises, contracts, cases, and taxes were influenced by political favors.
Which of the following is true of the spoils system?
The correct answer is C) The spoils system was the practice of granting jobs and political favors to those who supported the winning party during the election.
What inefficiency and corruption resulted from the spoils system?
Used to reward supporters with jobs. What inefficiency and corruption resulted from the spoils system? Corruption resulted as people used their jobs for personal gain. You just studied 21 terms!
What were the three original bureaucracy of the federal government?
The original bureaucracy of the federal government consisted only of employees from three small departments — State, Treasury, and War. The executive branch employs today almost three million people.