Who has the burden of proof in 12 Angry Men?
The burden of proof is the obligation to prove or disprove a fact presented in court. In Twelve Angry Men, this burden is placed on the shoulders of the prosecutors. They must prove that the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. If they do not, the defendant cannot rightfully be convicted.
Why does Juror 3 want the boy to be guilty?
Juror 3 has a son that he hasn’t spoken to in 3 years, so he is anxious to blame ‘rotten kids’ for all the problems that exist in the world. He was ashamed when his son was 8 and walked away from a fight, so he rode him hard to ‘make a man out of him.
Did three finally believe the boy was not guilty?
Did Three finally believe the boy was not guilty, or did he vote just to get it over with? Support your answer. He voted because he believed he was not guilty. Four told him,”let him live,” and Eight said,”He is not your boy.
Who was last juror to vote not guilty?
Angry juror
Why did each juror vote not guilty?
The doubts about the evidence against the boy, the pressure of the other eleven jurors, and perhaps an ultimate understanding of his own motivations combine to make him change his vote to “not guilty.”
How old is the defendant in the 12 angry men?
19-year-old
Why is Juror 7 in a hurry?
Juror Seven is a conceited man. He is rushed from the start of the play, which gives us the sense that he finds himself far too important for jury duty.
What is the theme of 12 Angry Men?
Three main themes in Twelve Angry Men are justice, innocence, and class. These themes are interwoven, playing off of each other as the jury deliberates. In their hands, justice seems fragile, subject to the whims of men who just want to go home.
What is the most important scene in 12 Angry Men?
Near the end of the film, the most powerful scene — objectively, is when Juror #10 rants about the incredibility of the accused based on his own personal prejudice. As Juror #10 rants to the rest of the jury, they all turn away. They don’t speak, they don’t argue.
Why does eight say he voted not guilty?
In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether. He votes not guilty because he feels that the group should discuss a case with such serious consequences before deciding.
Is Juror 8 the hero?
By the end of the movie, Juror #8 has proven himself to be a true hero for standing by his principles and having the courage and skill to put them to work. He eventually gets the jury to find the defendant Not Guilty, and in the process, he avoids sending an innocent 18 year-old kid to jail.
How much did Juror 8 pay for the knife he bought?
The two knives are twins; they are exactly alike. 31 As Juror #8 (Fonda) explains, he walked through the defendant’s neighborhood the previous night. He bought the knife for two dollars at a pawnshop three blocks from the accused’s house. 32 Soon thereafter, a juror switches his vote to not guilty.
Is it ever proven that the boy did not yell I’m going to kill you?
It is ever proven that the boy did not yell, “I’m going to kill you!”? No, it is not proven, it is speculated that the old man couldn’t have heard him, but it is not to say that the kid did not say it even so.
Why did Juror 5 change his vote?
Juror 9 bases his argument as to why the man lied by saying he is the same man and can relate. Why does Juror 5 change his vote? the old man could not have ‘run’ and even if he walked over he couldn’t have made his way over to the door as fast as he claimed. Juror 8 makes a new discovery as to why the boy is innocent.
Who are the antagonist in 12 Angry Men?
Juror 3 is the third of twelve jury members and the main antagonist in the teleplay and movie 12 Angry Men. He was portrayed by the late Lee J. Cobb in the 1957 film, and by the late George C.
Who actually voted not guilty why did he change his vote?
Why? Juror number nine changed his vote because he wanted to hear more from juror number eight. You just studied 9 terms!
Who voted not guilty in Act 2 of 12 Angry Men?
Terms in this set (11) what causes the conflict between jurors 3 and 5 at the opening of this scene? juror 3 thinks juror 5 voted not guilty and now they have to keep talking but juror 3 just wants to go home.
Why does Juror 11 get so angry at Juror 7 for changing his vote the way he does?
Juror 11 was criticized juror 7 for changing his vote to not guilty only because he wanted to go home .
Why is Juror 11 Juror 7 so closely?
why does juror 11 question juror 7 so closely about his willingness to change his vote? Juror 3 voted guilty because he wanted to get it over with. He also didn’t have enough courage to stand alone, nor was able to give facts to back up his reasoning for saying the boy was guilty.