Why does Kant think that immorality is irrational?
Kant asserts, therefore, that any action or lack of action, if done without good will, is immoral – making it also irrational. To do so, one must act without thinking of the consequences, merely if the maxim driving the action/inaction would in a universalized fashion produce rational and non-contradictory results.
What is the name of Kant’s supreme moral principle group of answer choices?
Kant’s moral theory is often referred to as the “respect for persons” theory of morality. Kant calls his fundamental moral principle the Categorical Imperative.
Which version of the categorical imperative does O’Neill use?
According to O’Neill, to treat another rational agent as a mere means is wrong unless doing so is required to treat other rational agents as ends in themselves. O’Neill explains Kant’s second formulation of his categorical imperative, the requirement that each person be treated as an end and never merely as a means.
Is O’Neill a Kantian?
O’Neill applies Kantian ethical theory to the problem of famine relief. She examines the demands that Kantian theory makes on us toward starving people in other countries and compares those demands with the demands of utilitarianism. She also compares how the two theories regard the value of human life.
What is the personal integrity objection in utilitarianism?
What is the integrity objection to Utilitarianism? Bernard Williams arguement that Utilitarianism can cause us to go against deeply held moral principles, thus compromising our moral integrity. The moral virtues are simply a subset of the general sense in which a human being is capable of functioning well.
What are the two kinds of utilitarianism?
The theory asserts that there are two types of utilitarian ethics practiced in the business world, “rule” utilitarianism and “act” utilitarianism. Rule utilitarianism helps the largest number of people using the fairest methods possible.
How does utilitarianism affect integrity?
Bernard Williams was the first to emphasize this line of argumentation – utilitarianism is a bad moral theory because, by requiring from us to reject conscience and our personal ideals in favour of the “lesser of evils”, it violates our moral integrity, itself a deep moral ideal (Williams 2004) .
What are the problems with Act utilitarianism?
The most common argument against act utilitarianism is that it gives the wrong answers to moral questions. Critics say that it permits various actions that everyone knows are morally wrong.