Why is the ability to adjust conclusions?

Why is the ability to adjust conclusions?

Answer: When new information leads to new and different conclusions, it is important to be able to adapt to the most up-to-date conclusions. If conclusions are rigid and fixed regardless of any new information that may come to light, then they are not truly based on the facts under discussion.

Which of the following is a step in evaluating the reliability of a website?

All of the above – reviewing the URL, determining who wrote the information the website contains, and searching for reviews of the website – are steps in evaluating a website’s reliability.

What are the four main criteria when evaluating resources?

Common evaluation criteria include: purpose and intended audience, authority and credibility, accuracy and reliability, currency and timeliness, and objectivity or bias. Each of these criteria will be explained in more detail below.

What are the four steps for evaluating websites?

Keep these things in mind when deciding if a web page is reliable and appropriate for your research:

  • authority/credibility.
  • accuracy/verifiability.
  • bias/objectivity.
  • currency/timeliness.
  • scope/depth.
  • intended audience/purpose.

How do you know if a source is relevant?

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.

  1. 1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source.
  2. 2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution.
  3. 3) Currency.
  4. 4) Coverage.

Why do we need to evaluate sources?

Evaluating information sources is a important part of the research process. Not all information is reliable or true, nor will all information be suitable for your paper or project. Users must be able to critically evaluate the appropriateness of all types of information sources prior to relying on the information.

What makes information valid?

In the business world, any research material must have support that can provide validity and reliability. The first is the validity of the information. This is the truthfulness of the source in respect to the information presented. Research method – The source should have statistically proven results.

How do you know information is credible?

Here are a few points to consider when evaluating sources for credibility:

  1. Be skeptical.
  2. Examine the source’s and author’s credentials and affiliations.
  3. Evaluate what sources are cited by the author.
  4. Make sure the source is up-to-date.
  5. Check the endorsements and reviews that the source received.

What makes a good source?

The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources.

What makes a bad source?

Bad Online Source Author is being objective Article/author is biased. They are taking a personal stand on social/political issues, promoting a product or idea, and not being objective. Should be a clear distinction between facts and opinions.

What makes a trustworthy news source?

27 What Makes a Trustworthy News Source? Transparency: Good news sources clearly mark opinion columns as opinion, disclose conflicts of interest, indicate in stories where information was obtained and how it was verified, and provide links to sources.

What’s the most reasonable way to get the opinions?

Do research at a library is the most reasonable way to get the opinions of experts on any writing topic.

What are 3 questions that we should ask when evaluating a source?

Critical Questions

  • Who is the creator/author/source/publisher of the information? What are the author’s credentials or affiliations?
  • Is the author’s expertise related to the subject? Are they an authority on the topic through education, experience, or expertise in the field?
  • Whose voices/viewpoints are not being heard?

Which of the following is an indicator that a source may not be accurate?

-is an indicator that a source may not be accurate. The author doesn’t offer facts, statistics, or specific examples, but uses vague statements and sweeping generalizations. -is an indicator that a source may not be accurate. This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Which one of the following is a indicator?

Indicators

Name Acid Color pH Range of Color Change
Litmus Red 5.0 – 8.0
Bromothymol blue Yellow 6.0 – 7.6
Thymol blue Yellow 8.0 – 9.6
Phenolphthalein Colorless 8.2 – 10.0

Which of the following is one of the three main guidelines for writing?

Stick to your subject

Which of the following is an indirect source Weegy?

A source that’s cited in another source is an indirect source. This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Which of the following is used to indicate an indirect source?

“qtd. in” is used to indicate an indirect source.

Which of these is the correct way to identify the title of a magazine article?

“Understanding the Exercise Conundrum” (in quotation marks) is the correct way to identify the title of a magazine article according to MLA style.

Which of the following shows the correct way to cite a second work in works cited?

Print. – shows the correct way to cite a second work in Works Cited with the title First Time’s a Charm by the author Lourdes Colon. This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top